Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713946›Full record

ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2018

Automated Risk Assessment for School Violence: a Pilot Study.

Drew Barzman, Yizhao Ni, Marcus Griffey, Alycia Bachtel, Kenneth Lin, Hannah Jackson, Michael Sorter, Melissa DelBello

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Drew BarzmanCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, USA. drew.barzman@cchmc.org.
Yizhao NiCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, USA.
Marcus GriffeyCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, USA.
Alycia BachtelCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, USA.
Kenneth LinCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, USA.
Hannah JacksonUniversity of Dayton, Dayton, USA.
Michael SorterCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC), Cincinnati, USA.
Melissa DelBelloUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, USA.
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Dayton · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

School violence has increased over the past ten years. This study evaluated students using a more standard and sensitive method to help identify students who are at high risk for school violence. 103 participants were recruited through Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC) from psychiatry outpatient clinics, the inpatient units, and the emergency department. Participants (ages 12-18) were active students in 74 traditional schools (i.e. non-online education). Collateral information was gathered from guardians before participants were evaluated. School risk evaluations were performed with each participant, and audio recordings from the evaluations were later transcribed and manually annotated. The BRACHA (School Version) and the School Safety Scale (SSS), both 14-item scales, were used. A template of open-ended questions was also used. This analysis included 103 participants who were recruited from 74 different schools. Of the 103 students evaluated, 55 were found to be moderate to high risk and 48 were found to be low risk based on the paper risk assessments including the BRACHA and SSS. Both the BRACHA and the SSS were highly correlated with risk of violence to others (Pearson correlations>0.82). There were significant differences in BRACHA and SSS total scores between low risk and high risk to others groups (p-values <0.001 under unpaired t-test). In particular, there were significant differences in individual SSS items between the two groups (p-value <0.001). Of these items, Previous Violent Behavior (Pearson Correlation = 0.80), Impulsivity (0.69), School Problems (0.64), and Negative Attitudes (0.61) were positively correlated with risk to others. The novel machine learning algorithm achieved an AUC of 91.02% when using the interview content to predict risk of school violence, and the AUC increased to 91.45% when demographic and socioeconomic data were added. Our study indicates that the BRACHA and SSS are clinically useful for assessing risk for school violence. The machine learning algorithm was highly accurate in assessing school violence risk.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorAggressionMachine LearningSchoolsViolenceAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleNatural Language ProcessingRisk AssessmentMachine learningNatural language processingSchool safetySchool shootingsSchool violenceSchool violence risk assessment

Identifiers

PMID29713946
OpenAlexW2800558316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.