Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713942›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Results of The Comparative Study of 200 Cases: One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Salvador Navarrete, José Luis Leyba, Salvador Navarrete Ll, Guillermo Borjas, José León Tapia, Ruben Alcázar

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of the Long-term Outcomes of RYGB and OAGB as Conversion Procedures After Failed LSG - a Case-Control Study.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Salvador NavarreteUniversidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela. navarretesalvador@yahoo.com.
José Luis LeybaUniversidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela.
Salvador Navarrete LlCleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Guillermo BorjasClínica Sagrada Familia, Maracaibo, Venezuela.
José León TapiaClínica El Pilar, Barinas, Venezuela.
Ruben AlcázarAdvanced Laparoscopic Surgery, Clínica Santa Sofía, Caracas, Venezuela.
Central University of Venezuela · VEHospital Clínico Universitario de Caracas · VECleveland Clinic · USHospital Universitario de Maracaibo · VE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity has experienced worldwide increase and surgery has become the treatment that has achieved the best results. Several techniques have been described; the most popular are vertical gastrectomy (GV) and the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). However, mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB/OAGB) has gained popularity due to its simplicity and good results.

objectiveTo comparatively evaluate the results of MGB/OAGB with those of RYGB with 1-year follow-up.

methodsThe paper presents a comparative case and control study of 100 patients that underwent MGB/OAGB surgery and another 100 with RYGB surgery, operated between 2008 and 2016. Patients were not submitted to revision surgery and had the following pre-operative variables: age 40.46 ± 12.4 vs. 39.43 ± 10.33 years; sex 64 and 54 women, 36 and 46 men; BMI 44.8 ± 12.06 and 45.29 ± 8.82 kg/m

resultsThe surgical time was 69.01 ± 4.62 (OAGB) vs. 88.98 ± 3.44 min; the time of hospitalization was 2 days, reaching a BMI of 27.7 ± 7.85 and 29 ± 4.52 kg/m

conclusionsThe results show the benefits of both techniques, OAGB being the easiest to perform and with less surgical time.

Indexed as

Gastric BypassObesity, MorbidAdultComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeWeight LossBariatric surgeryGastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypassRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID29713942
OpenAlexW2800119291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.