Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713901›Full record

ArticleParasitology research2018

Efficacy of larvicides for the control of dengue, Zika, and chikungunya vectors in an urban cemetery in southern Mexico.

Carlos F Marina, J Guillermo Bond, José Muñoz, Javier Valle, Humberto Quiroz-Martínez, Jorge A Torres-Monzón, Trevor Williams

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Carlos F MarinaCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública - INSP, 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
J Guillermo BondCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública - INSP, 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
José MuñozCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública - INSP, 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Javier ValleECOSUR, 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Humberto Quiroz-MartínezFacultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, 66450, San Nicolás de los Garza, Nuevo León, Mexico.
Jorge A Torres-MonzónCentro Regional de Investigación en Salud Pública - INSP, 30700, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.
Trevor WilliamsInstituto de Ecología AC (INECOL), Xalapa, 91070, Veracruz, Mexico. trevor.williams@inecol.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3414-3440

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología FOSISSS 2012-180201
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many countries in Latin America have recently experienced outbreaks of Zika and chikungunya fever, in additional to the usual burden imposed by dengue, all of which are transmitted by Aedes aegypti in this region. To identify potential larvicides, we determined the toxicity of eight modern insecticides to A. aegypti larvae from a colony that originated from field-collected insects in southern Mexico. The most toxic compounds were pyriproxyfen (which prevented adult emergence) and λ-cyhalothrin, followed by spinetoram, imidacloprid, thiamethoxam, and acetamiprid, with chlorantraniliprole and spiromesifen the least toxic products. Field trails performed in an urban cemetery during a chikungunya epidemic revealed that insecticide-treated ovitraps were completely protected from the presence of Aedes larvae and pupae for 6 and 7 weeks in spinosad (Natular G30) and λ-cyhalothrin-treated traps in both seasons, respectively, compared to 5-6 weeks for temephos granule-treated ovitraps, but was variable for pyriproxyfen-treated ovitraps with and 1 and 5 weeks of absolute control in the dry and rainy seasons, respectively. Insecticide treatments influenced the mean numbers of Aedes larvae + pupae in each ovitrap, mean numbers of eggs laid, and percentage of egg hatch over time in both trials. The dominant species was A. aegypti in both seasons, although the invasive vector Aedes albopictus was more prevalent in the rainy season (26.7%) compared to the dry season (10.2%). We conclude that the granular formulation of spinosad (Natular G30) and a suspension concentrate formulation of λ-cyhalothrin proved highly effective against Aedes spp. in both the dry and rainy seasons in the cemetery habitat in this region.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsCemeteriesChikungunya FeverDengueDrug CombinationsInsecticidesInsect VectorsLarvaMacrolidesMexicoNeonicotinoidsNitrilesNitro Compoundsortho-AminobenzoatesOxazinesacetamipridchlorantranilipolecyhalothrinDrug CombinationsimidaclopridInsecticidesMacrolidesNeonicotinoidsNitrilesNitro Compoundsortho-AminobenzoatesOxazinesPyrethrinsPyridinespyriproxyfenspinetoramspinosadSpiro CompoundsspiromesifenTemefosThiamethoxamThiazolesAedes spp.Field trailsInsecticide toxicityLarvicideOviposition

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.