Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713787›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2018

Cognitive profile of ketamine-dependent patients compared with methamphetamine-dependent patients and healthy controls.

Liang-Jen Wang, Chih-Ken Chen, Shih-Ku Lin, Yi-Chih Chen, Ke Xu, Ming-Chyi Huang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Liang-Jen WangDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chih-Ken ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Shih-Ku LinTaipei City Psychiatric Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Chih ChenDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Ke XuDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Heaven, CT, USA.
Ming-Chyi HuangTaipei City Psychiatric Center, Taipei City Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan. mch@tpech.gov.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9751-9834
Chang Gung University · TWTaipei City Hospital · TWYale University · US

Funding

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan CMRPG2D0261, CMRPG8C1291 and CMRPG8D0481Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 103-2628-B-532-001-MY3, 106-2314-B-532 -005 -MY3Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan 98-2314-B-182-001-MY3, 101-2314-B-182-080, 102-2314-B-182-007Taipei City Hospital 10601-62-018, 10701-62-029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKetamine has emerged as a major substance of abuse worldwide and has been listed with methamphetamine (METH) as two of the most widely available illicit substances in Taiwan. Only a few studies have examined the long-term consequences of chronic and heavy ketamine abuse. We compared the cognitive function of ketamine-dependent patients with that of METH-dependent patients and healthy controls.

methodsWe recruited 165 participants (58 ketamine-dependent and 49 METH-dependent patients who sought treatment and 58 healthy controls) and evaluated them by using a cognitive test battery, the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia, with scores being estimated in reference to normative data in general population.

resultsThe ketamine-dependent patients had significantly poorer performance than did the controls in many cognitive tests, including verbal memory, motor speed, verbal fluency, and attention and processing speed, and the battery as a whole. METH-dependent patients exhibited poorer function in motor speed, verbal fluency, and attention and processing speed. The ketamine group performed poorer than did METH group in the domains of verbal memory, working memory, and attention and processing speed and the composite battery scores. A previous experience of ketamine-induced psychotomimetic symptoms, using higher doses of ketamine, and longer abstinence appeared to be associated with performance in some tests; however, the significance disappeared after multiple comparison correction.

conclusionsThe ketamine-dependent patients had impaired cognitive function, and METH-dependent patients exhibited intermediate performance between ketamine-dependent patients and healthy controls. Given the growing population of ketamine abusers, public education on the cognitive consequences should be provided.

Indexed as

AttentionCognitionKetamineMemory, Short-TermMethamphetamineAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersCase-Control StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleNeuropsychological TestsSubstance-Related DisordersTaiwanKetamineMethamphetamineCognitionKetamineMethamphetaminePsychosisSubstance dependence

Identifiers

PMID29713787
OpenAlexW2800749866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.