Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713675›Full record

ArticleEndoscopy international open2018

Evaluation of a new stent for EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage: long-term follow-up outcome.

Yukitoshi Matsunami, Takao Itoi, Atsushi Sofuni, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Kentaro Kamada, Reina Tanaka, Ryosuke Tonozuka, Mitsuyoshi Honjo, Shuntaro Mukai, Mitsuru Fujita and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Endoscopy international open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Current status and future perspectives for endoscopic treatment of local complications in chronic pancreatitis.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage: a single-center observational study.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Biliary and pancreatic stents.iGIE : innovation, investigation and insights · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. [Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Drainage in Pancreatobiliary Diseases].The Korean journal of gastroenterology = Taehan Sohwagi Hakhoe chi · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. EUS-guided pancreatic duct drainage with rendezvous technique for post-Whipple pancreatic duct stone.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yukitoshi MatsunamiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takao ItoiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi SofuniDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takayoshi TsuchiyaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kentaro KamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Reina TanakaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryosuke TonozukaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuyoshi HonjoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shuntaro MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsuru FujitaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenjiro YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasutsugu AsaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Takashi KurosawaDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Shingo TachibanaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuichi NagakawaDepartment of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY

aimsEndoscopic ultrasonography-guided pancreatic duct drainage (EUS-PD) has been reported as an alternative for failed conventional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, there are few dedicated devices for EUS-PD. Recently, we have developed a new plastic stent dedicated to EUS-PD and have conducted a feasibility study to evaluate its efficacy. In the current study, we evaluated the long-term efficacy of this new plastic stent. PATIENTS AND

methodsThirty patients (61 ± 14.3 years old, 14 men) with acute recurrent pancreatitis caused by a stricture in the main pancreatic duct (MPD) or stenotic pancreatoenterostomy were treated at our institution using our recently developed 7Fr plastic stent between August 2013 and April 2017.

resultsThe stent was placed successfully in all patients (30/30) and early clinical success was achieved in all of them. Early adverse events (AEs) occurred in seven patients (23.3 %), namely, self-limited abdominal pain (n = 5), mild pancreatitis (n = 1), and bleeding which required transcatheter arterial embolization (n = 1). Two patients died of primary disease and three were lost to follow-up. The remaining 25 patients were followed up after initial EUS-PD for a median of 23 months (range, 6 - 44 months). Twenty patients required regular stent exchange (3 times; range, 1 - 12 times). Spontaneous stent dislodgement was observed in six patients. Four patients wanted their stents removed 1 year after the initial intervention. Twelve patients (48 %) had regular stent exchange 1 year after the initial intervention. Three patients converted to standard transpapillary pancreatic duct stenting by conventional ERCP. Finally, nine patients (36 %) had complete stent removal either intentionally or by spontaneous dislodgement without any symptoms.

conclusionThe new plastic stent for EUS-PD was associated with not only short-term technical success but also long-term clinical success in the majority of patients evaluated in this study.

Identifiers

PMID29713675
PMCPMC5906111
OpenAlexW2799782455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.