ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2018
Relevant Measures to Prevent the Spread of African Swine Fever in the European Union Domestic Pig Sector.
Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- African Swine Fever: Lessons to Learn From Past Eradication Experiences. A Systematic Review.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluation of Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives on the Preparedness of Ghana's Animal Health Services for African Swine Fever Control: A Cross-Sectional Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Biosecurity risks for African swine fever occurrence in smallholder systems in Gauteng, South Africa.The Onderstepoort journal of veterinary research · 2026Article
- Integrated Hunting Strategies for African Swine Fever Control in Wild Boar: A Comparative Review of Experiences in European Continent.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
- Assessment of African swine fever impact in Bulgaria with special focus on the East Balkan Swine.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025Article
- Automated Detection and Counting of Wild Boar in Camera Trap Images.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Identifying Effective Biosecurity Measures for Preventing the Introduction of Classical Swine Fever in Pig Farms in Japan: Under the Condition of Absence/Presence of Observable Infected Wild Boar.Transboundary and emerging diseases · 2024Article
- African Swine Fever: A Review of Current Disease Management Strategies and Risks Associated with Exhibition Swine in the United States.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Genetic analysis of African swine fever viruses based on E183L (p54) gene, circulating in South Sumatra and Lampung province, Indonesia.Veterinary world · 2023Article
- Risk Factor Impact on African Swine Fever Transmission in Different Extensive Pig Production Settings in Serbia.Viruses · 2023Article
- Assessing and improving on-farm biosecurity knowledge and practices among swine producers and veterinarians through online surveys and an educational website in Illinois, United States.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2023Article
- Article
- A Novel Tool to Assess the Risk for African Swine Fever in Hunting Environments: The Balkan Experience.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Wild Boars as Reservoir of Highly Virulent Clone of Hybrid Shiga Toxigenic and Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Responsible for Edema Disease, France.Emerging infectious diseases · 2022Article
- African Swine Fever Survey in a European Context.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A proteomics informed by transcriptomics insight into the proteome of Ornithodoros erraticus adult tick saliva.Parasites & vectors · 2022Article
- Supporting control programs on African swine fever in Ukraine through a knowledge, attitudes, and practices survey targeting backyard farmers.Veterinary medicine and science · 2021Article
- The first genotype II African swine fever virus isolated in Africa provides insight into the current Eurasian pandemic.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- African swine fever and outdoor farming of pigs.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the past decade, African swine fever (ASF) has spread from the Caucasus region to eastern European Union countries affecting domestic pig and wild boar populations. In order to avert ASF spread, mitigation measures targeting both populations have been established. However, despite these efforts, ASF has been reported in thirteen different countries (Georgia, Azerbaijan, Armenia, the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Belarus, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Moldova, Czech Republic, and Romania). In the absence of an effective vaccine or treatment to ASF, introduction and spread of ASF onto domestic pig farms can only be prevented by strict compliance to control measures. This study systematically reviewed available measures to prevent the spread of ASF in the EU domestic pig sector distinguishing between commercial, non-commercial, and outdoor farms. The search was performed in PubMed and using a common browser. A total of 52 documents were selected for the final review process, which included scientific articles, reports, EU documents and official recommendations, among others. From this literature review, 37 measures were identified as preventive measures for the introduction and spread of ASF. Subsequently, these measures were assessed by ASF experts for their relevance in the mitigation of ASF spread on the three mentioned types of farms. All experts agreed that some of the important preventive measures for all three types of farms were: the identification of animals and farm records; strict enforcement of the ban on swill feeding; and containment of pigs, so as to not allow direct or indirect pig-pig and/or pig-wild boar contacts. Other important preventive measures for all farms were education of farmers, workers, and operators; no contact between farmers and farm staff and external pigs; appropriate removal of carcasses, slaughter residues, and food waste; proper disposal of manure and dead animals, and abstaining from hunting activities during the previous 48 h (allowing a 48 h interval between hunting and being in contact with domestic pigs). Finally, all experts identified that the important preventive measures for non-commercial and outdoor farms is to improve access of those farms to veterinarians and health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.