Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713615›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2018

Lung Nodule Detection

Issa Ali, Gregory R Hart, Gowthaman Gunabushanam, Ying Liang, Wazir Muhammad, Bradley Nartowt, Michael Kane, Xiaomei Ma, Jun Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reinforcement learning using DeepBMC medical imaging · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Discriminating TB lung nodules from early lung cancers using deep learning.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Issa AliDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Gregory R HartDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Gowthaman GunabushanamDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Ying LiangDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Wazir MuhammadDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Bradley NartowtDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Michael KaneDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Xiaomei MaDepartment of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.
Jun DengDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States.

Funding

Tracking Organ Doses for Patient Safety in Radiation TherapyR01EB022589 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI DENG, JUN · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022589
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related death globally. As a preventive measure, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends annual screening of high risk individuals with low-dose computed tomography (CT). The resulting volume of CT scans from millions of people will pose a significant challenge for radiologists to interpret. To fill this gap, computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithms may prove to be the most promising solution. A crucial first step in the analysis of lung cancer screening results using CAD is the detection of pulmonary nodules, which may represent early-stage lung cancer. The objective of this work is to develop and validate a reinforcement learning model based on deep artificial neural networks for early detection of lung nodules in thoracic CT images. Inspired by the AlphaGo system, our deep learning algorithm takes a raw CT image as input and views it as a collection of states, and output a classification of whether a nodule is present or not. The dataset used to train our model is the LIDC/IDRI database hosted by the lung nodule analysis (LUNA) challenge. In total, there are 888 CT scans with annotations based on agreement from at least three out of four radiologists. As a result, there are 590 individuals having one or more nodules, and 298 having none. Our training results yielded an overall accuracy of 99.1% [sensitivity 99.2%, specificity 99.1%, positive predictive value (PPV) 99.1%, negative predictive value (NPV) 99.2%]. In our test, the results yielded an overall accuracy of 64.4% (sensitivity 58.9%, specificity 55.3%, PPV 54.2%, and NPV 60.0%). These early results show promise in solving the major issue of false positives in CT screening of lung nodules, and may help to save unnecessary follow-up tests and expenditures.

Indexed as

computed tomographycomputer-aided detectionlung cancerlung nodulesreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID29713615
PMCPMC5912002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.