Article3 Biotech2018
Association analysis of drought tolerance in cut chrysanthemum (
Article in 3 Biotech, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-locus GWAS uncovers favorable alleles and candidate genes underlying water stress response in chrysanthemum.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Phenotypic Characterization and Marker-Trait Association Analysis Using SCoT Markers in Chrysanthemum (Genes · 2025Article
- Genetic architecture and genomic prediction of plant height-related traits in chrysanthemum.Horticulture research · 2024Article
- Bioinformatics in Plant Breeding and Research on Disease Resistance.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Towards the Improvement of Ornamental Attributes in Chrysanthemum: Recent Progress in Biotechnological Advances.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Development of EST-SSR markers and association mapping with floral traits in Syringa oblata.BMC plant biology · 2020Article
- Anthocyanins in Floral Colors: Biosynthesis and Regulation in Chrysanthemum Flowers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Current achievements and future prospects in the genetic breeding of chrysanthemum: a review.Horticulture research · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the genetic architecture is a prerequisite for crop improvement. The current research aimed to characterize the extent of genetic variation of drought tolerance harbored in a global collection of 159 chrysanthemum cultivars over 2 years. An average subordinate function value (ASFV), integrating the wilting index, the fresh weight retention rate, and the survival rate after re-watering under two drought-stressed trials, was used to quantify the level of drought tolerance. The performance of ASFV was generally correlated between the 2 years; and a high magnitude (0.95) of broad-sense heritability, coupled with the moderate genetic advance, was estimated for the ASFV. By applying MLM model with both population structure and kinship matrix as covariates association mapping identified 16 markers linked to drought tolerance, with the proportion of the phenotypic variation explained by an individual marker ranging from 4.4 to 7.6%. Of the eight markers predictive across the 2 years, four (E11M24-9, E3M2-8, E1M5-5, and EST-SSR34-3) were identified as favorable alleles for drought tolerance. Several cultivars that carry at least three of the four favorable alleles were identified as potential donor parents for future improvement of the drought tolerance. The findings provide an insight into the genetic basis of the drought tolerance in chrysanthemum and will, therefore, aid in developing new cultivars with enhanced tolerance against drought stress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.