Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713516›Full record

ArticleActa naturae

Pathogenesis of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Rodent Experimental Models.

I G Gvazava, O S Rogovaya, M A Borisov, E A Vorotelyak, A V Vasiliev

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta naturae. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Diabetes Mellitus, Mitochondrial Dysfunction and CaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Transport of CaCells · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

I G GvazavaKoltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str. 26, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
O S RogovayaKoltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str. 26, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
M A BorisovKoltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str. 26, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
E A VorotelyakKoltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str. 26, Moscow, 119334, Russia.
A V VasilievKoltsov Institute of Developmental Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vavilova Str. 26, Moscow, 119334, Russia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The global prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its severe complications is on the rise. The study of the pathogenesis of the onset and the progression of complications related to the disease, as well as the search for new therapeutic agents and methods of treatment, remains relevant. Experimental models are extremely important in the study of diabetes. This survey contains a synthesis of the most commonly used experimental animal models described in scientific literature. The mechanisms of the streptozotocin model are also analyzed and discussed, as it is considered as the most adequate and easily reproducible diabetes model. A review of the significant advantages and disadvantages of the described models has also been conducted.

Indexed as

beta-cellsdiabetesexperimental laboratory animalshyperglycemiaLangerhans isletspathogenesisstreptozotocin

Identifiers

PMID29713516
PMCPMC5916731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.