ArticleCell & bioscience2018
Is adult cardiac regeneration absent in
Article in Cell & bioscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart regeneration from the whole-organism perspective to single-cell resolution.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2024Review
- Regenerative loss in the animal kingdom as viewed from the mouse digit tip and heart.Developmental biology · 2024Review
- Animal models to study cardiac regeneration.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2024Review
- Vertebrate cardiac regeneration: evolutionary and developmental perspectives.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2021Review
- Derivation of proliferative islet1-positive cells during metamorphosis and wound response in Xenopus.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2021Article
- Review
- Conservation and divergence of protein pathways in the vertebrate heart.PLoS biology · 2019Article
- Stage-dependent cardiac regeneration inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Cell-based therapies for the treatment of myocardial infarction: lessons from cardiac regeneration and repair mechanisms in non-human vertebrates.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We recently used an endoscopy-based resection method to explore the consequences of cardiac injury in adult
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.