ArticleCancer cell international2018
Prognostic role of RDW in hematological malignancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in Cancer cell international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Red cell distribution width as a prognostic predictor for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Pooled it
- Prognostic value of red blood cell distribution width and D-Dimer in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Pooled it
- Assessing the Predictive Power of the Hemoglobin/Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic role of red blood cell distribution width in patients with sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC immunology · 2020Pooled it
- Prognostic impact of red blood cell distribution width in pulmonary hypertension patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- MiR-19a as a prognostic indicator for cancer patients: a meta-analysis.Bioscience reports · 2019Pooled it
- MiR-20a, a novel promising biomarker to predict prognosis in human cancer: a meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2018Pooled it
- Metformin and risk of hematological cancers in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of Saudi medicinePooled it
- A nomogram to predict prolonged stay of obesity patients with sepsis in ICU: Relevancy for predictive, personalized, preventive, and participatory healthcare strategies.Frontiers in public health · 2022Trial
- Baseline Red Blood Cell Distribution Width as a Prognostic Marker in High-Risk Resected Cutaneous Melanoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Red cell distribution width and cerebral white matter hyperintensity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Red cell indices as predictors of cancer risk: findings from a large prospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Comparing therapeutic effects across tyrosine kinase inhibitors: Chronic myeloid leukemia outcomes and analysis of influencing factors.Medicine · 2025Observational
- Reading Between the Lines: Complete Blood Count-Derived Parameters as Prognostic Factors in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology · 2025Article
- The Red Cell Distribution Width to Albumin Ratio: A Novel Prognostic Indicator in Hepatitis B Virus-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of medical sciences · 2025Article
- Association between anion gap/calcium ratio and 30-day all-cause mortality in sepsis patients with diabetes mellitus.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Red cell distribution width and mean platelet volume detection in patients with endometrial cancer and endometrial hyperplasia.Health science reports · 2024Article
- Clinical values of preoperative red blood cell distribution width and platelet parameters in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2024Article
- Hematological ratios and indices in canine large B-cell lymphoma.Open veterinary journal · 2024Article
- Changes in RDW according to prognostic predictors in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRed blood cell distribution width (RDW), a biomarker for discrimination of anemia, has been recently identified as a prognostic factor in various types of cancer. Here we performed a meta-analysis in order to assess the correlation between RDW and the survival outcomes in patients with hematologic malignances. PATIENTS/
methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and ISI Web of Science for relevant studies, to investigate the prognostic significance of RDW in hematological malignancies. Odds ratios or hazards ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are pooled to estimate the association between RDW and clinicopathological parameters of patients with hematologic malignances.
resultsSeven trials with 1031 patients suffering from hematological malignancies were included in the meta-analysis, and the results indicated that increased pretreatment RDW predicted poor overall survival (HR = 2.35, 95% CI 1.70-3.24), poor progress-free survival (HR = 2.44, 95% CI 1.70-3.49) and poor event-free survival (EFS) (HR = 3.15, 95% CI 1.59-6.25). Furthermore, the similar results were observed in subgroup analysis stratified by cancer type, such as multiple myeloma, and diffuse large B cell lymphoma, etc.
conclusionsAs for hematologic malignances, patients with higher RDW are more likely to have poorer prognosis than those with lower RDW.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.