Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29713180›Full record

ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2018

Calcification score versus arterial stenosis grading: comparison of two CT-based methods for risk assessment of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.

De-Hua Chang, Sebastian Brinkmann, Lucy Smith, Ingrid Becker, Wolfgang Schroeder, Arnulf H Hoelscher, Stefan Haneder, David Maintz, Judith Eva Spiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

De-Hua Chang *Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Sebastian Brinkmann *Department of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Lucy SmithFaculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, Canada.
Ingrid BeckerInstitute of Medical Statistics and Computational Biology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Wolfgang SchroederDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Arnulf H HoelscherAgaplesion Markus Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Stefan HanederDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
David MaintzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Judith Eva SpiroDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnastomotic leakage is a major surgical complication following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. Specific risk factors such as celiac trunk (TC) stenosis and high calcification score of the aorta have been identified, but no data are available on their relative prognostic values. This retrospective study aimed to compare and evaluate calcification score versus stenosis quantification with regards to prognostic impact on anastomotic leakage. PATIENTS AND

methodsPreoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans of 164 consecutive patients with primary esophageal cancer were evaluated by two radiologists to apply a calcification score (0-3 scale) assessing the aorta, the celiac axis and the right and left postceliac arteries. Concurrently, the presence and degree of stenosis of TC and superior mesenteric artery were recorded for stenosis quantification.

resultsAnastomotic leakage was noted in 14/164 patients and 12/14 showed stenosis of TC (n=11). The presence of TC stenosis was found to have a significant impact on anastomotic healing (

conclusionMeasurement of TC stenosis in preoperative contrast-enhanced computed tomography scans proved to be more reliable than calcification scores in predicting anastomotic leakage and should, therefore, be used in the risk assessment of patients undergoing esophagectomy and gastric pull-up.

Indexed as

anastomotic leakagecalcification scoregraft perfusionIvor Lewis esophagectomystenosis quantificationTC stenosis

Identifiers

PMID29713180
PMCPMC5909785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.