ReviewInternational journal of nanomedicine2018
Global trends in nanomedicine research on triple negative breast cancer: a bibliometric analysis.
Review in International journal of nanomedicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed, 82 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of nanotechnology in triple negative breast cancer research: a bibliometric and emerging trends analysis.Discover nano · 2026Review
- Fundamental knowledge and research regarding the role of immunity in triple-negative breast cancer from 2014-2024: A bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Global research status and frontiers on autophagy in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC): a comprehensive bibliometric and visualized analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Current perspectives and global trends of nanotechnology in advanced breast cancer: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Knowledge mapping of ultrasound technology and triple-negative breast cancer: a visual and bibliometric analysis.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Global research trends in endoscopy applications in submucosal tumor: A bibliometric analysis of studies published from 2010-2024.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- Targeting Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Resistance Mechanisms and Therapeutic Advancements.Cancer medicine · 2025Review
- Co-delivery of fucoxanthin and Twist siRNA using hydroxyethyl starch-cholesterol self-assembled polymer nanoparticles for triple-negative breast cancer synergistic therapy.Journal of advanced research · 2025Article
- Influence of Nanomedicine as a Smart Weapon for Multidrug Resistance in Cancer Therapy.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025Review
- A Visual Analysis of the Research Dynamics in Resistance to EGFR Inhibitors for NSCLC.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Article
- Trends in Nanoparticles for Leishmania Treatment: A Bibliometric and Network Analysis.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Recent Advances in Targeted Nanocarriers for the Management of Triple Negative Breast Cancer.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Research trends and prospects on brain metastasis from breast cancer: A bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Busting the Breast Cancer with AstraZeneca's Gefitinib.Advances in pharmacological and pharmaceutical sciences · 2023Review
- Mapping the intellectual structure and landscape of nano-drug delivery systems in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- The global landscape and research trend of phase separation in cancer: a bibliometric analysis and visualization.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- A bibliometric analysis of 16,826 triple-negative breast cancer publications using multiple machine learning algorithms: Progress in the past 17 years.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Global research trends of endoscope in early gastric cancer: A bibliometric and visualized analysis study over past 20 years.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Antiproliferative activity, cell-cycle arrest, apoptotic induction and LC-HRMS/MS analyses of extracts from twoPharmaceutical biology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanotechnology has emerged as a promising tool in the clinic to combat several difficult-to-manage diseases, such as cancer, which is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Chemotherapeutic drugs present several limitations such as undesired side effects, low specificity, resistance, and high relapse rates. Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is caused by cells that lack specific receptors in their membrane, such as estrogen (ER+) and progesterone (PR+) receptors, or by cells that do not express the amplification of human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2+). This cancer type has poor prognosis, high relapse rates, and no targeted therapies. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the trends of nanotechnology research in TNBC and compare the contribution of research from different regions, institutions, and authors. A search of the studies published between 2012 and 2017, related to nanotechnology and TNBC, with different keyword combinations, was performed in the Scopus database. The keywords found in this search were grouped into four clusters, in which "breast cancer" was the most mentioned (1,133 times) and the word "MCF-7 cell line" is one of the latest hotspots that appeared in the year 2016. A total of 1,932 articles, which were cited 26,450 times, were identified. The USA accounted for 28.36% of the articles and 27.61% of the citations; however, none of its centers appeared in the list of 10 most productive ones in terms of publications. The journals
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.