ArticleNature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology2018
Personalized screening for colorectal cancer.
Article in Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Diagnostic yield of a risk model versus faecal immunochemical test only: a randomised controlled trial in a colorectal cancer screening programme.British journal of cancer · 2023Trial
- Large language models for clinical decision support in gastroenterology and hepatology.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Review
- Global, regional, and national burden of colorectal cancer, 1990Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024Article
- The global burden and trends analysis of early-onset colorectal cancer attributable to dietary risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a secondary analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Article
- Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using Genetic and Environmental Risk Factors: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Based on Real-World Data.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2023Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Decision Based on Predicted Risk: Protocol for a Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Decision-making in screening positive participants who follow up with colonoscopy in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme: A mixed-method study.Psycho-oncology · 2022Article
- Identification of methyltransferase-like protein 11B as a new prognostic biomarker for colorectal cancer through an analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Article
- The Differential Risk of Cervical Cancer in HPV-Vaccinated and -Unvaccinated Women: A Mathematical Modeling Study.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021Article
- Colorectal cancer screening in the COVID-19 era.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021Review
- Risk of colorectal cancer in patients with diabetes mellitus: A Swedish nationwide cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2020Article
- Small molecule NSC1892 targets the CUL4A/4B-DDB1 interactions and causes impairment of CRL4International journal of biological sciences · 2020Article
- Liquid biopsy and PCR-free ultrasensitive detection systems in oncology (Review).International journal of oncology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29713023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.