Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29712896›Full record

Trial reportBlood cancer journal2018

Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in East Asian patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: subgroup analyses of the phase 3 POLLUX study.

Kenshi Suzuki, Meletios A Dimopoulos, Naoki Takezako, Shinichiro Okamoto, Atsushi Shinagawa, Morio Matsumoto, Hiroshi Kosugi, Sung-Soo Yoon, Shang-Yi Huang, Xiang Qin and 2 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood cancer journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. [Progress in the treatment of multiple myeloma with daratumumab].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. What to do with minimal residual disease testing in myeloma.Hematology. American Society of Hematology. Education Program · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kenshi SuzukiDepartment of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Meletios A DimopoulosNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Naoki TakezakoDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center of Japan, Tachikawa, Japan.
Shinichiro OkamotoKeio University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi ShinagawaHitachi General Hospital, Hitachi, Japan.
Morio MatsumotoDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organization Shibukawa Medical Center, Shibukawa, Japan.
Hiroshi KosugiDepartment of Hematology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan.
Sung-Soo YoonSeoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Shang-Yi HuangNational Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Xiang QinJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Ming QiJanssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, USA.
Shinsuke IidaNagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan. iida@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the phase 3 POLLUX study, daratumumab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (DRd) significantly reduced the risk of progression/death and induced deeper responses vs. lenalidomide and dexamethasone alone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We report a subgroup analysis of East Asian (Japanese, Korean, and Taiwanese) patients from POLLUX based on a longer follow-up of 24.7 months. Median progression-free survival was not reached (NR) for DRd vs. 13.8 months for Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23-0.76), and overall response rates were higher for DRd vs. Rd (90.2 vs. 72.1%). DRd extended the median duration of response vs. Rd (NR vs. 20.2 months), and minimal residual disease-negative rates at the 10

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsDexamethasoneDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansLenalidomideMaleMiddle AgedMultiple MyelomaRecurrenceRetreatmentTreatment OutcomeAntibodies, MonoclonaldaratumumabDexamethasoneLenalidomide

Identifiers

PMID29712896
PMCPMC5928154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.