Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29712857›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2018

Symbiont switching and alternative resource acquisition strategies drive mutualism breakdown.

Gijsbert D A Werner, Johannes H C Cornelissen, William K Cornwell, Nadejda A Soudzilovskaia, Jens Kattge, Stuart A West, E Toby Kiers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mutualism and division of labour: a mutual expansion of concepts.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gijsbert D A WernerDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3PS; gijsbert.werner@zoo.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5426-2562
Johannes H C CornelissenDepartment of Ecological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
William K CornwellSchool of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052 Australia.
Nadejda A SoudzilovskaiaConservation Biology Department, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Leiden University, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jens KattgeMax Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, 07745 Jena, Germany.
Stuart A WestDepartment of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom OX1 3PS.
E Toby KiersDepartment of Ecological Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

European Research Council 335542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cooperative interactions among species, termed mutualisms, have played a crucial role in the evolution of life on Earth. However, despite key potential benefits to partners, there are many cases in which two species cease to cooperate and mutualisms break down. What factors drive the evolutionary breakdown of mutualism? We examined the pathways toward breakdowns of the mutualism between plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. By using a comparative approach, we identify ∼25 independent cases of complete mutualism breakdown across global seed plants. We found that breakdown of cooperation was only stable when host plants (

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEnvironmentFeedback, PhysiologicalMycorrhizaePlantsSymbiosiscooperationmacroevolutionmutualismmycorrhizaesymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29712857
PMCPMC5960305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.