Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29712628›Full record

ArticleJMIR cancer2018

A Web-Based Intervention to Reduce Distress After Prostate Cancer Treatment: Development and Feasibility of the Getting Down to Coping Program in Two Different Clinical Settings.

Jane Cockle-Hearne, Deborah Barnett, James Hicks, Mhairi Simpson, Isabel White, Sara Faithfull

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04693910 (Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Multimedia-based Hormonal Therapy Information Program for Patients With Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04693910 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Development and Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Multimedia-based Hormonal Therapy Information Program for Patients With Prostate Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesRan2019 to 2021Enrolled80ConditionsProstatic NeoplasmsArmsMultimedia-Based Hormone Therapy Information Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Digital supportive care in prostate cancer: a systematic review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Interactive digital tools to support empowerment of people with cancer: a systematic literature review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. The efficacy of web or mobile-based interventions to alleviate emotional symptoms in people with advanced cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Acceptability and Feasibility of a Guided Biopsychosocial Online Intervention for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jane Cockle-HearneSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6084-856X
Deborah BarnettTime to Talk, Brighton General Hospital, Sussex Community NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7105-2751
James HicksSt. Richard's Hospital, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Chichester, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4983-4159
Mhairi SimpsonAccess Division - Cancer, NHS Lanarkshire, Monklands Hospital, Airdrie, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3172-3207
Isabel WhiteApplied Health Research Group, Department of Psychological Support and Pastoral Care, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3572-8969
Sara FaithfullSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-0243
University of Surrey · GBNHS Lanarkshire · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBSt Richard's Hospital · GBSussex Community NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-1111-26098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDistress after prostate cancer treatment is a substantial burden for up to one-third of men diagnosed. Physical and emotional symptoms and health service use can intensify, yet men are reticent to accept support. To provide accessible support that can be cost effectively integrated into care pathways, we developed a unique, Web-based, self-guided, cognitive-behavior program incorporating filmed and interactive peer support.

objectiveTo assess feasibility of the intervention among men experiencing distress after prostate cancer treatment. Demand, acceptability, change in distress and self-efficacy, and challenges for implementation in clinical practice were measured.

methodsA pre-post, within-participant comparison, mixed-methods research design was followed. Phase I and II were conducted in primary care psychological service and secondary care cancer service, respectively. Men received clinician-generated postal invitations: phase I, 432 men diagnosed <5 years; phase II, 606 men diagnosed <3.5 years. Consent was Web-based. Men with mild and moderate distress were enrolled. Web-based assessment included demographic, disease, treatment characteristics; distress (General Health Questionnaire-28); depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9); anxiety (General Anxiety Disorder Scale-7); self-efficacy (Self-Efficacy for Symptom Control Inventory); satisfaction (author-generated, Likert-type questionnaire). Uptake and adherence were assessed with reference to the persuasive systems design model. Telephone interviews explored participant experience (phase II, n=10); interviews with health care professionals (n=3) explored implementation issues.

resultsA total of 135 men consented (phase I, 61/432, 14.1%; phase II, 74/606, 12.2%); from 96 eligible men screened for distress, 32% (30/96) entered the intervention (phase I, n=10; phase II, n=20). Twenty-four completed the Web-based program and assessments (phase I, n=8; phase II, n=16). Adherence for phase I and II was module completion rate 63% (mean 2.5, SD 1.9) versus 92% (mean 3.7, SD 1.0); rate of completing cognitive behavior therapy exercises 77% (mean 16.1, SD 6.2) versus 88% (mean 18.6, SD 3.9). Chat room activity occurred among 63% (5/8) and 75% (12/16) of men, respectively. In phase I, 75% (6/8) of men viewed all the films; in phase II, the total number of unique views weekly was 16, 11, 11, and 10, respectively. The phase II mood diary was completed by 100% (16/16) of men. Satisfaction was high for the program and films. Limited efficacy testing indicated improvement in distress baseline to post intervention: phase I, P=.03, r=-.55; phase II, P=.001, r=-.59. Self-efficacy improved for coping P=.02, r=-.41. Service assessment confirmed ease of assimilation into clinical practice and clarified health care practitioner roles.

conclusionsThe Web-based program is acceptable and innovative in clinical practice. It was endorsed by patients and has potential to positively impact the experience of men with distress after prostate cancer treatment. It can potentially be delivered in a stepped model of psychological support in primary or secondary care. Feasibility evidence is compelling, supporting further evaluative research to determine clinical and cost effectiveness.

Indexed as

cognitive behavior therapyInternetprimary health careprostatic neoplasmssecondary careself-management

Identifiers

PMID29712628
PMCPMC5952123
OpenAlexW2799698792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.