Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29712564›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2018

Effectiveness of a new model of primary care management on knee pain and function in patients with knee osteoarthritis: Protocol for THE PARTNER STUDY.

David J Hunter, Rana S Hinman, Jocelyn L Bowden, Thorlene Egerton, Andrew M Briggs, Stephen J Bunker, Jessica Kasza, Andrew B Forbes, Simon D French, Marie Pirotta and 4 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Low-value care in musculoskeletal health care: Is there a way forward?Pain practice : the official journal of World Institute of Pain · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

David J HunterInstitute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. david.hunter@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3197-752X
Rana S HinmanCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jocelyn L BowdenInstitute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Thorlene EgertonCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew M BriggsSchool of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Stephen J BunkerDepartment of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Jessica KaszaBiostatistics Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Andrew B ForbesBiostatistics Unit, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Simon D FrenchSchool of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Marie PirottaDepartment of General Practice, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Deborah J SchofieldDepartment of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Nicholas A ZwarSchool of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kim L BennellCentre for Health, Exercise and Sports Medicine, Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
PARTNER Study Team
The University of Melbourne · AUThe University of Sydney · AUMonash University · AUQueen's University · CAUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1079078National Health and Medical Research Council APP1115720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo increase the uptake of key clinical recommendations for non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) and improve patient outcomes, we developed a new model of service delivery (PARTNER model) and an intervention to implement the model in the Australian primary care setting. We will evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of this model compared to usual general practice care.

methodsWe will conduct a mixed-methods study, including a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial, with quantitative, qualitative and economic evaluations. We will recruit 44 general practices and 572 patients with knee OA in urban and regional practices in Victoria and New South Wales. The interventions will target both general practitioners (GPs) and their patients at the practice level. Practices will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio. Patients will be recruited if they are aged ≥45 years and have experienced knee pain ≥4/10 on a numerical rating scale for more than three months. Outcomes are self-reported, patient-level validated measures with the primary outcomes being change in pain and function at 12 months. Secondary outcomes will be assessed at 6 and 12 months. The implementation intervention will support and provide education to intervention group GPs to deliver effective management for patients with knee OA using tailored online training and electronic medical record support. Participants with knee OA will have an initial GP visit to confirm their diagnosis and receive management according to GP intervention or control group allocation. As part of the intervention group GP management, participants with knee OA will be referred to a centralised multidisciplinary service: the PARTNER Care Support Team (CST). The CST will be trained in behaviour change support and evidence-based knee OA management. They will work with patients to develop a collaborative action plan focussed on key self-management behaviours, and communicate with the patients' GPs. Patients receiving care by intervention group GPs will receive tailored OA educational materials, a leg muscle strengthening program, and access to a weight-loss program as appropriate and agreed. GPs in the control group will receive no additional training and their patients will receive usual care. DISCUSSION: This project aims to address a major evidence-to-practice gap in primary care management of OA by evaluating a new service delivery model implemented with an intervention targeting GP practice behaviours to improve the health of people with knee OA.

trial registrationAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12617001595303 , date of registration 1/12/2017.

Indexed as

Recovery of FunctionAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew South WalesOsteoarthritis, KneePainPain ManagementPatient Outcome AssessmentPrimary Health CareTreatment OutcomeVictoriaClinical trialKnee osteoarthritisModel of service deliveryPrimary careRCT

Identifiers

PMID29712564
PMCPMC5928565
OpenAlexW2806812352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.