Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710863›Full record

ArticleNutrients2018

Pilot Testing of an Intensive Cooking Course for New Zealand Adolescents: The Create-Our-Own Kai Study.

Katherine Black, Carla Thomson, Themis Chryssidis, Rosie Finigan, Callum Hann, Rosalie Jackson, Caleb Robinson, Olivia Toldi, Paula Skidmore

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine BlackDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. katherine.black@otago.ac.nz.
Carla ThomsonDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. carla.thomson@otago.ac.nz.
Themis ChryssidisSprout Cooking School and Health Studio, 89 Sir Donald Bradman Drive, Hilton, South Australia 5033. themis@sprout.edu.au.
Rosie FiniganDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. rosie.finigan@otago.ac.nz.
Callum HannSprout Cooking School and Health Studio, 89 Sir Donald Bradman Drive, Hilton, South Australia 5033. callum@sprout.edu.au.
Rosalie JacksonDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. jacro835@student.otago.ac.nz.
Caleb RobinsonDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. caleb.robinson@otago.ac.nz.
Olivia ToldiDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. tolol778@student.otago.ac.nz.
Paula SkidmoreDepartment of Human Nutrition, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand. paula.skidmore@otago.ac.nz.
University of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of cooking on health and wellbeing is a recent area of scientific interest. In order to investigate this role, a cooking program that is suitable for each target population is needed e.g., a program designed for American or Australian children might not be appropriate for teenagers in New Zealand. As there was no similar previously evaluated program already available, the study’s purpose was to test an intensive cooking intervention on cooking confidence and knowledge amongst a group of adolescents from Dunedin, New Zealand, and to assess its acceptability to participants. This five-day program comprised interactive cooking sessions and informal nutrition education and ran from 9 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., Monday to Friday during school holidays. Participants completed questionnaires on cooking skills and confidence at baseline and the end of intervention and took part in a group interview, which aimed to investigate the acceptability and outcome of the program. Twenty-one participants aged between 12 and 16 years old completed the program. At the end of the program, significant increases were seen in both skills and confidence levels, and feedback from the group interview indicated that the participants enjoyed the program and that it provided additional results other than those that were cooking related.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorCookingDiet, HealthyHealth BehaviorHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdolescentAge FactorsChild Nutrition SciencesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleNew ZealandPilot ProjectsProgram Evaluationadolescentscookingdietself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID29710863
PMCPMC5986436
OpenAlexW2801887189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.