Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710797›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of environmental research and public health2018

Health Seeking Behavior among Rural Left-Behind Children: Evidence from Shaanxi and Gansu Provinces in China.

Hongyu Guan, Huan Wang, Juerong Huang, Kang Du, Jin Zhao, Matthew Boswell, Yaojiang Shi, Mony Iyer, Scott Rozelle

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Hongyu GuanCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. guanhongyu2016@163.com.
Huan WangCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. huanw@stanford.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3219-7226
Juerong HuangCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. huangjuerongceee@163.com.
Kang DuCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. dukangceee@163.com.
Jin ZhaoCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. zhaojinceee@163.com.
Matthew BoswellFreeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. kefka@stanford.edu.
Yaojiang ShiCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. shiyaojiang7@gmail.com.
Mony IyerOnesight Foundation, 4000 Luxottica Pl, Mason, OH 45040, USA. viyer@onesight.org.
Scott RozelleCenter for Experimental Economics in Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, 710127, China. rozelle@stanford.edu.
Shaanxi Normal University · CNStanford University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 60 million children in rural China are “left-behind”—both parents live and work far from their rural homes and leave their children behind. This paper explores differences in how left-behind and non-left-behind children seek health remediation in China’s vast but understudied rural areas. This study examines this question in the context of a program to provide vision health care to myopic rural students. The data come from a randomized controlled trial of 13,100 students in Gansu and Shaanxi provinces in China. The results show that without a subsidy, uptake of health care services is low, even if individuals are provided with evidence of a potential problem (an eyeglasses prescription). Uptake rises two to three times when this information is paired with a subsidy voucher redeemable for a free pair of prescription eyeglasses. In fact, left-behind children who receive an eyeglasses voucher are not only more likely to redeem it, but also more likely to use the eyeglasses both in the short term and long term. In other words, in terms of uptake of care and compliance with treatment, the voucher program benefitted left-behind students more than non-left-behind students. The results provide a scientific understanding of differential impacts for guiding effective implementation of health policy to all groups in need in developing countries.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorFamily SeparationHealth BehaviorRural HealthRural Health ServicesAdolescentChildChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient Compliancehealthcareleft-behind childrenrandomized controlled trialrural China

Identifiers

PMID29710797
PMCPMC5981922
OpenAlexW2801482103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.