Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710290›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018

Comparison of Access to Eye Care Appointments Between Patients With Medicaid and Those With Private Health Care Insurance.

Yoon H Lee, Andrew X Chen, Varshini Varadaraj, Gloria H Hong, Yimin Chen, David S Friedman, Joshua D Stein, Nicholas Kourgialis, Joshua R Ehrlich

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Israeli eye care system through a public and global health lens.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Factors associated with pediatric ophthalmology follow-up adherence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yoon H LeeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Andrew X ChenCenter for Eye Policy and Innovation, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Varshini VaradarajDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gloria H HongDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yimin ChenCenter for Eye Policy and Innovation, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
David S FriedmanDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins Wilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Joshua D SteinCenter for Eye Policy and Innovation, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Nicholas KourgialisHelen Keller International, New York, New York.
Joshua R EhrlichCenter for Eye Policy and Innovation, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USJohns Hopkins University · USHelen Keller International · US

Funding

Personalized Forecasting of Disease Trajectory for Patients with Open Angle GlaucomaR01EY026641 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LAVIERI-WILLIAMS, MARIEL SOFIA, STEIN, JOSHUA D · 2016 to 2020
$2.9M
Addressing Low Vision due to Severe Peripheral Field Loss: Development and Validation of a Patient-Centered Outcome MeasureK23EY027848 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI EHRLICH, JOSHUA ROBERT · 2017 to 2021
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS K23 EY027848NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026641
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although low-income populations have more eye problems, whether they face greater difficulty obtaining eye care appointments is unknown. Objective: To compare rates of obtaining eye care appointments and appointment wait times for those with Medicaid vs those with private insurance. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, cohort study conducted from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2017, researchers made telephone calls to a randomly selected sample of vision care professionals in Michigan and Maryland stratified by neighborhood (urban vs rural) and professional type (ophthalmologist vs optometrist) to request the first available appointment. Appointments were sought for an adult needing a diabetic eye examination and a child requesting a routine eye examination for a failed vision screening. Researchers called each practice twice, once requesting an appointment for a patient with Medicaid and the other time for a patient with Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance, and asked whether the insurance was accepted and, if so, when the earliest available appointment could be scheduled. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of successfully made appointments and mean wait time for the first available appointment. Results: A total of 603 telephone calls were made to 330 eye care professionals (414 calls [68.7%] to male and 189 calls [31.3%] to female eye care professionals). The sample consisted of ophthalmologists (303 [50.2%]) and optometrists (300 [49.8%]) located in Maryland (322 [53.4%]) and Michigan (281 [46.6%]). The rates of successfully obtaining appointments among callers were 61.5% (95% CI, 56.0%-67.0%) for adults with Medicaid and 79.3% (95% CI, 74.7%-83.9%) for adults with BCBS (P < .001) and 45.4% (95% CI, 39.8%-51.0%) for children with Medicaid and 62.5% (95% CI, 57.1%-68.0%) for children with BCBS (P < .001). Mean wait time did not vary significantly between the BCBS and Medicaid groups for both adults and children. Adults with Medicaid had significantly decreased odds of receiving an appointment compared with those with BCBS (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.59; P < .001) but had increased odds of obtaining an appointment if they were located in Michigan vs Maryland (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.49-3.87; P < .001) or with an optometrist vs an ophthalmologist (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.79; P < .001). Children with Medicaid had significantly decreased odds of receiving an appointment compared with those with BCBS (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60; P < .001) but had increased odds of obtaining an appointment if they were located in Michigan vs Maryland (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04-2.73; P = .03) or with an optometrist vs an ophthalmologist (OR, 8.00; 95% CI, 5.37-11.90; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Callers were less successful in trying to obtain eye care appointments with Medicaid than with BCBS, suggesting a disparity in access to eye care based on insurance status, although confounding factors may have contributed to this finding. Improving access to eye care professionals for those with Medicaid may improve health outcomes and decrease health care spending in the long term.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesAdultChildCohort StudiesEye DiseasesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInsurance CoverageInsurance, HealthMaleMedicaidOphthalmologistsOptometristsProspective StudiesRural Population

Identifiers

PMID29710290
PMCPMC6007883
OpenAlexW2802125124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.