ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2018
Comparison of Access to Eye Care Appointments Between Patients With Medicaid and Those With Private Health Care Insurance.
Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health through Telemedicine Program: Impact on Vision, Follow-up, and Costs.Ophthalmology · 2025Trial
- Resource utilization and outcomes of inpatient eyelid reconstruction in facial palsy patients: A 20-year HCUP-NIS study.JPRAS open · 2026Article
- Revealing the Blind Spots: Linked EHRs Associate Racial and Ethnic Inequities in Diabetic Eye Care Testing.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026Article
- Design of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparing the Michigan Screening and Intervention for Glaucoma and Eye Health and Telemedicine Protocol with Usual Care for Disease Detection.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- Dissemination and implementation science for global ophthalmology: closing the last-mile translational gap.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Social Determinants of Diabetic Retinopathy Severity at Initial Presentation: A Cross-Sectional Study of Data from an Urban Safety Net Hospital.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2026Article
- The Israeli eye care system through a public and global health lens.Israel journal of health policy research · 2025Review
- Persistent disparities in diabetic retinopathy outcomes among socially deprived individuals despite treatment adherence.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Current status of school vision screening-rationale, models, impact and challenges: a review.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2025Review
- Medicaid Accessibility for Ophthalmologists and Optometrists in Florida: A Pilot Study.Cureus · 2025Article
- Barriers to Care for Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus: An Analysis of U.S. Specialty Clinic Access.O&G open · 2025Article
- Disparities in Medicaid and Medicare physician reimbursements for ophthalmic procedures.PloS one · 2025Article
- Eye Care in Federally Qualified Health Centers.Ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Factors associated with pediatric ophthalmology follow-up adherence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus · 2024Article
- Article
- Evaluating the Relationship between Neighborhood-Level Social Vulnerability and Patient Adherence to Ophthalmology Appointments.Ophthalmic epidemiology · 2024Article
- Demographic, Socioeconomic, and Clinical Factors Associated with Severe Vision Loss in Patients with Neovascular Glaucoma.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Barriers and Facilitators to Ophthalmology Visit Adherence in an Urban Hospital Setting.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Limited English Proficiency Is Associated With Diabetic Retinopathy in Patients Presenting for Cataract Surgery.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Observational
- Nationwide trends in emergency department utilisation for acute retinal ischaemia in the USA, 2011-2018.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Although low-income populations have more eye problems, whether they face greater difficulty obtaining eye care appointments is unknown. Objective: To compare rates of obtaining eye care appointments and appointment wait times for those with Medicaid vs those with private insurance. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this prospective, cohort study conducted from January 1, 2017, to July 1, 2017, researchers made telephone calls to a randomly selected sample of vision care professionals in Michigan and Maryland stratified by neighborhood (urban vs rural) and professional type (ophthalmologist vs optometrist) to request the first available appointment. Appointments were sought for an adult needing a diabetic eye examination and a child requesting a routine eye examination for a failed vision screening. Researchers called each practice twice, once requesting an appointment for a patient with Medicaid and the other time for a patient with Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) insurance, and asked whether the insurance was accepted and, if so, when the earliest available appointment could be scheduled. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of successfully made appointments and mean wait time for the first available appointment. Results: A total of 603 telephone calls were made to 330 eye care professionals (414 calls [68.7%] to male and 189 calls [31.3%] to female eye care professionals). The sample consisted of ophthalmologists (303 [50.2%]) and optometrists (300 [49.8%]) located in Maryland (322 [53.4%]) and Michigan (281 [46.6%]). The rates of successfully obtaining appointments among callers were 61.5% (95% CI, 56.0%-67.0%) for adults with Medicaid and 79.3% (95% CI, 74.7%-83.9%) for adults with BCBS (P < .001) and 45.4% (95% CI, 39.8%-51.0%) for children with Medicaid and 62.5% (95% CI, 57.1%-68.0%) for children with BCBS (P < .001). Mean wait time did not vary significantly between the BCBS and Medicaid groups for both adults and children. Adults with Medicaid had significantly decreased odds of receiving an appointment compared with those with BCBS (odds ratio [OR], 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.59; P < .001) but had increased odds of obtaining an appointment if they were located in Michigan vs Maryland (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.49-3.87; P < .001) or with an optometrist vs an ophthalmologist (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.79; P < .001). Children with Medicaid had significantly decreased odds of receiving an appointment compared with those with BCBS (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.60; P < .001) but had increased odds of obtaining an appointment if they were located in Michigan vs Maryland (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.04-2.73; P = .03) or with an optometrist vs an ophthalmologist (OR, 8.00; 95% CI, 5.37-11.90; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Callers were less successful in trying to obtain eye care appointments with Medicaid than with BCBS, suggesting a disparity in access to eye care based on insurance status, although confounding factors may have contributed to this finding. Improving access to eye care professionals for those with Medicaid may improve health outcomes and decrease health care spending in the long term.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.