Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710278›Full record

Observational studyJAMA surgery2018

Association of Expectations of Training With Attrition in General Surgery Residents.

Jonathan S Abelson, Julie A Sosa, Matthew M Symer, Jialin Mao, Fabrizio Michelassi, Richard Bell, Art Sedrakyan, Heather L Yeo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in JAMA surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan S AbelsonDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Julie A SosaDepartment of Surgery, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Matthew M SymerDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Jialin MaoDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Fabrizio MichelassiDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Richard BellDepartment of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Art SedrakyanDepartment of Healthcare Policy and Research, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Heather L YeoDepartment of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Presbyterian Hospital · USCornell University · USDuke Medical Center · USNew York Hospital Queens · USNewYork–Presbyterian Hospital · USTemple University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Attrition from general surgery training is highest during internship. Whether the expectations and attitudes of new trainees affect their subsequent risk of attrition is unknown. Objective: To identify the expectations of general surgery residency associated with attrition from training. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective observational cohort study included categorical general surgery interns entering training in the 2007-2008 academic year. Residents were surveyed regarding their expectations of training and of life as an attending at the start of their intern year (June 1 to August 31, 2007). Expectations were grouped into factors by principal component analysis, and a multivariable model was created using these factors in addition to known demographic and program characteristics associated with attrition. Follow-up was completed on December 31, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: Attrition from training was determined by linkage to American Board of Surgery resident files through 2016, allowing 8 additional years of follow-up. Results: Of 1048 categorical surgery interns in the study period, 870 took the survey (83.0% response rate), and 828 had complete information available for analysis (524 men [63.3%], 303 women [36.6%], and 1 missing information [0.1%]). Most were white (569 [69.1%]) and at academic programs (500 [60.4%]). Six hundred sixty-six residents (80.4%) completed training. Principal component analysis generated 6 factors. On adjusted analysis, 2 factors were associated with attrition. Interns who choose their residency based on program reputation (factor 2) were more likely to drop out (odds ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15). Interns who expected as an attending to work more than 80 hours per week, to have a stressful life, and to be the subject of malpractice litigation (career life expectation [factor 6]) were less likely to drop out (odds ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.82-0.98). Conclusions and Relevance: Interns with realistic expectations of the demands of residency and life as an attending may be more likely to complete training. Medical students and residents entering training should be given clear guidance in what to expect as a surgery resident.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelMotivationCareer ChoiceEducational MeasurementEducation, Medical, GraduateFemaleGeneral SurgeryHumansInternship and ResidencyMaleProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID29710278
PMCPMC6142955
OpenAlexW2802792302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.