Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710224›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2018

Hormone Replacement Therapy After Oophorectomy and Breast Cancer Risk Among BRCA1 Mutation Carriers.

Joanne Kotsopoulos, Jacek Gronwald, Beth Y Karlan, Tomasz Huzarski, Nadine Tung, Pal Moller, Susan Armel, Henry T Lynch, Leigha Senter, Andrea Eisen and 7 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 72 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Menopausal hormone therapy and comprehensive postmenopausal care in gynecologic cancer survivors: A position paper from the FIGO Committee on Women at Menopausal Age.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Estrogens and breast cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Joanne KotsopoulosWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jacek GronwaldInternational Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Beth Y KarlanGynecology Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Tomasz HuzarskiInternational Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Nadine TungBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Pal MollerInherited Cancer Research Group, The Norwegian Radium Hospital, Department for Medical Genetics, Department of Tumor Biology, Institute of Cancer Research, The Norwegian Radium Hospital; Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Susan ArmelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Henry T LynchDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, Nebraska.
Leigha SenterDivision of Human Genetics, the Ohio State University Medical Center, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus.
Andrea EisenToronto-Sunnybrook Regional Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Christian F SingerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
William D FoulkesProgram in Cancer Genetics, Department of Oncology and Human Genetics, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Michelle R JacobsonWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Ping SunWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jan LubinskiInternational Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Steven A NarodWomen's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hereditary Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group
Women's College Hospital · CAInternational Hereditary Cancer Center · PLBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USCreighton University · USMcGill University · CAMedical University of Vienna · ATOslo University Hospital · NOPomeranian Medical University · PLPublic Health Ontario · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy is recommended for BRCA1 mutation carriers to prevent ovarian cancer. Whether or not hormone replacement therapy (HRT) initiated after oophorectomy is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer has not been evaluated in a prospective study. Objective: To determine the association between HRT use and BRCA1-associated breast cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, longitudinal cohort study of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers from 80 participating centers in 17 countries was conducted between 1995 and 2017 with a mean follow-up of 7.6 years. Participants had sought genetic testing for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation because of a personal or family history of breast and/or ovarian cancer. Carriers of BRCA1 mutation with no personal medical history of cancer who underwent bilateral oophorectomy following enrollment were eligible for the cohort study. Exposures: A follow-up questionnaire was administered every 2 years to obtain detailed information on HRT use. A left-truncated Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to estimate the hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs associated with the initiation of HRT use postoophorectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Incident breast cancer. Results: A total of 872 BRCA1 mutation carriers with a mean postoophorectomy follow-up period of 7.6 years (range, 0.4-22.1) were included in this study. Mean (SD) age of participants was 43.4 (8.5) years. Among these, 92 (10.6%) incident breast cancers were diagnosed. Overall, HRT use after oophorectomy was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. The HR was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.62-1.52; P = .89) for ever use of any type of HRT vs no use; however, the effects of estrogen alone and combination hormonal therapy were different. After 10 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of breast cancer among women who used estrogen-alone HRT was 12% compared with 22% among women who used estrogen plus progesterone HRT (absolute difference, 10%; log rank P = .04). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that use of estrogen after oophorectomy does not increase the risk of breast cancer among women with a BRCA1 mutation and should reassure BRCA1 mutation carriers considering preventive surgery that HRT is safe. The possible adverse effect of progesterone-containing HRT warrants further study.

Indexed as

MutationAdultBRCA1 ProteinBreast NeoplasmsCanadaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHormone Replacement TherapyHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedOvarian NeoplasmsOvariectomyPrognosisBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID29710224
PMCPMC6143051
OpenAlexW2800412330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.