Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710180›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2018

Estimation of the Percentage of US Patients With Cancer Who Benefit From Genome-Driven Oncology.

John Marquart, Emerson Y Chen, Vinay Prasad

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT05189171 (MicroOrganoSphere Drug Screen to Lead Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 162 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
162citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05189171 completednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

MicroOrganoSphere Drug Screen to Lead Care (MODEL) Precision Oncology Pilot Trial in Colorectal Cancer (CRC)

TypeobservationalSponsorXilis, Inc.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled46ConditionsColorectal NeoplasmsArmsMicroOrganoSphere (MOS) drug screen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

162 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tumor cell intrinsic mechanisms of immune escape.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026
    Review
  12. Impact of next-generation sequencing on routine clinical practice and patient inclusion in molecularly targeted clinical trials: a retrospective cohort analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

102 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

John MarquartSchool of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Emerson Y ChenDivision of Hematology Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.
Vinay PrasadDivision of Hematology Oncology, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: To date, the benefit of genome-driven cancer therapy has not been quantified. Objective: We sought to estimate the annual percentage of patients in the United States with advanced or metastatic cancer who could be eligible for and benefit from US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved genome-driven therapy from 2006 to 2018. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective cross-sectional study using publically available data of (1) demographic characteristics of patients with advanced or metastatic cancer; (2) FDA data on cancer drugs approved from January 2006 through January 2018; (3) measures of response and duration of response from drug labels; and (4) published reports estimating the frequency of various genomic aberrations used to estimate what percentage of patients would have been eligible for and would have benefited from genome-driven therapy during the studied period. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated percentage of US patients with cancer eligible for and benefiting from genome-targeted and genome-informed therapy by year, response rate of genome-informed indications, and duration of response. Results: A total of 31 drugs with 38 FDA-approved indications met our inclusion criteria for genome-targeted or genome-informed therapy from January 1, 2006, through January 31, 2018. The estimated number of patients eligible for genome-targeted therapy in 2006 was 28 729 of a total 564 830 patients with metastatic cancer, or 5.09% (95% CI, 5.03%-5.14%). By 2018, this number had increased to 50 811 of 609 640, or 8.33% (95% CI, 8.26%-8.40%). For genome-informed therapy in 2006, the eligible number of patients was 59 301 of 564 830, or 10.50% (95% CI, 10.42%-10.58%). In 2018, genome-informed treatment could be offered to 94 157 of 609 640, or 15.44% (95% CI, 15.35%-15.53%) of patients with metastatic cancer. The percentage of patients with cancer estimated to benefit from genome-targeted therapy in 2006 was 0.70% (95% CI, 0.68%-0.72%), and in 2018, it had increased to 4.90% (95% CI, 4.85%-4.95%). For genome-informed treatment in 2006, the percentage estimated to benefit was 1.31% (95% CI, 1.28%-1.34%), and in 2018, it had increased to 6.62% (95% CI, 6.56%-6.68%). The median overall response rate for all genome-informed drugs through January 2018 was 54%, and the median duration of response was 29.5 months. Conclusions and Relevance: Although the number of patients eligible for genome-driven treatment has increased over time, these drugs have helped a minority of patients with advanced cancer. To accelerate progress in precision oncology, novel trial designs of genomic therapies should be developed, and broad portfolios of drug development, including immunotherapeutic and cytotoxic approaches, should be pursued.

Indexed as

Molecular Targeted TherapyPharmacogeneticsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCross-Sectional StudiesDrug ApprovalGene Expression ProfilingHumansNeoplasmsPrecision MedicinePrognosisRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID29710180
PMCPMC6143048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.