ArticleJAMA2018
Noncommercial Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.
Article in JAMA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2023Pooled it
- Review
- Journal data-sharing policies and its impact in publications: A cross-sectional study protocol.PloS one · 2025Article
- Adoption of World Health Organization Best Practices in Clinical Trial Transparency Among European Medical Research Funder Policies.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- Discrepancies between FDA documents and ClinicalTrials.gov for Orphan Drug-related clinical trial data.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- Perceptions and Opinions Towards Data-Sharing: A Survey of Addiction Journal Editorial Board Members.The journal of scientific practice and integrity · 2022Article
- Status, use and impact of sharing individual participant data from clinical trials: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Top health research funders' guidance on selecting journals for funded research.F1000Research · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- Funders' data-sharing policies in therapeutic research: A survey of commercial and non-commercial funders.PloS one · 2020Article
- Sharing of clinical trial data and results reporting practices among large pharmaceutical companies: cross sectional descriptive study and pilot of a tool to improve company practices.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Article
- Evaluation of Journal Registration Policies and Prospective Registration of Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonregulated Health Care Interventions.JAMA internal medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- Noncommercial US Funders' Policies on Trial Registration, Access to Summary Results, and Individual Patient Data Availability.JAMA network open · 2019Article
- Examining the role of funders in ensuring value and reducing waste in research: An organizational case-study of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.F1000Research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.