Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710126›Full record

ArticleJAMA oncology2018

Estimation of Future Cancer Burden Among Rescue and Recovery Workers Exposed to the World Trade Center Disaster.

Ankura Singh, Rachel Zeig-Owens, William Moir, Charles B Hall, Theresa Schwartz, Madeline Vossbrinck, Nadia Jaber, Mayris P Webber, Kerry J Kelly, Viola Ortiz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Anticancer Effect of Mycotoxins FromInternational journal of microbiology · 2024
    Review
  2. Mutagenicity of the organic fraction of World Trade Center dust.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2023
    Article
  3. Characteristics of Cancers in Community Members Exposed to the World Trade Center Disaster at a Young Age.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Lung Cancer Characteristics in the World Trade Center Environmental Health Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  5. World Trade Center Health Program: First Decade of Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  6. Characteristics of Cancer Patients in the World Trade Center Environmental Health Center.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ankura SinghPulmonary Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Rachel Zeig-OwensPulmonary Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
William MoirPulmonary Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Charles B HallDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Theresa SchwartzPulmonary Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Madeline VossbrinckPulmonary Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Nadia JaberThe Bureau of Health Services and Office of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of the City of New York, Brooklyn, New York.
Mayris P WebberThe Bureau of Health Services and Office of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of the City of New York, Brooklyn, New York.
Kerry J KellyThe Bureau of Health Services and Office of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of the City of New York, Brooklyn, New York.
Viola OrtizThe Bureau of Health Services and Office of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of the City of New York, Brooklyn, New York.
Ellen KofflerThe Bureau of Health Services and Office of Medical Affairs, Fire Department of the City of New York, Brooklyn, New York.
David J PrezantPulmonary Medicine Division, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Elevated rates of cancer have been reported in individuals exposed to the World Trade Center (WTC) disaster, including Fire Department of the City of New York (FDNY) rescue and recovery workers. Objective: To project the future burden of cancer in WTC-exposed FDNY rescue and recovery workers by estimating the 20-year cancer incidence. Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 14 474 WTC-exposed FDNY employees who were cancer-free on January 1, 2012; subgroup analyses were conducted of the cohort's white male population (n = 12 374). In this closed-cohort study, we projected cancer incidence for the January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2031, period. Simulations were run using demographic-specific New York City (NYC) cancer and national mortality rates for each individual, summed for the whole cohort, and performed 1000 times to produce mean estimates. Additional analyses in the subgroup of white men compared case counts produced by using 2007-2011 FDNY WTC Health Program (FDNY-WTCHP) cancer rates vs NYC rates. Average and 20-year aggregate costs of first-year cancer care were estimated using claims data. Exposures: World Trade Center disaster exposure defined as rescue and recovery work at the WTC site at any time from September 11, 2001, to July 25, 2002. Main Outcomes and Measures: (1) Projected number of incident cancers in the full cohort, based on NYC cancer rates; (2) cancer incidence estimates in the subgroup projected using FDNY-WTCHP vs NYC rates; and (3) estimated first-year treatment costs of incident cancers. Results: On January 1, 2012, the cohort was 96.8% male, 87.1% white, and had a mean (SD) age of 50.2 (9.2) years. The projected number of incident cancer cases was 2960 (95% CI, 2883-3037). In our subgroup analyses using FDNY-WTCHP vs NYC cancer rates, the projected number of new cases in white men was elevated (2714 [95% CI, 2638-2786] vs 2596 [95% CI, 2524-2668]). Accordingly, we expect more prostate (1437 [95% CI, 1383-1495] vs 863 [95% CI, 816-910]), thyroid (73 [95% CI, 60-86] vs 57 [95% CI, 44-69]), and melanoma cases (201 [95% CI, 179-223] vs 131 [95% CI, 112-150), but fewer lung (237 [95% CI, 212-262] vs 373 [95% CI, 343-405]), colorectal (172 [95% CI, 152-191] vs 267 [95% CI, 241-292]), and kidney cancers (66 [95% CI, 54-80] vs 132 [95% CI, 114-152]) (P < .001 for all comparisons). The estimated 20-year cost of first-year treatment was $235 835 412 (95% CI, $187 582 227-$284 088 597). Conclusions and Relevance: We project that the FDNY-WTCHP cohort will experience a greater cancer burden than would be expected from a demographically similar population. This underscores the importance of cancer prevention efforts and routine screening in WTC-exposed rescue and recovery workers.

Indexed as

DisastersEmergency RespondersEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationRescue WorkSeptember 11 Terrorist AttacksAdultAgedAir PollutantsCarcinogens, EnvironmentalCohort StudiesFirefightersForecastingHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedAir PollutantsCarcinogens, Environmental

Identifiers

PMID29710126
PMCPMC5933461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.