Trial reportAnnals of internal medicine2018
Long-Term Effectiveness of Sigmoidoscopy Screening on Colorectal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in Women and Men: A Randomized Trial.
Trial report in Annals of internal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00119912 (Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 78 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention Trial
Who cites it
78 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.
- Noncancer-Related Mortality in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2025Pooled it
- Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges-a systematic review.Trials · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness of sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Pooled it
- AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.Gastroenterology · 2023Guideline
- Pooled it
- Is flexible sigmoidoscopy screening associated with reducing colorectal cancer incidence and mortality? a meta-analysis and systematic review.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Establishing thresholds for important benefits considering the harms of screening interventions.BMJ open · 2020Pooled it
- Colorectal cancer screening with faecal testing, sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of risk-adapted colorectal cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial and modeling analysis.Military Medical Research · 2025Trial
- Akita Japan population-based colonoscopy screening trial: report of initial colonoscopy.BMJ open gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Effectiveness of Colonoscopy Screening vs Sigmoidoscopy Screening in Colorectal Cancer.JAMA network open · 2024Trial
- The CRCbiome study: a large prospective cohort study examining the role of lifestyle and the gut microbiome in colorectal cancer screening participants.BMC cancer · 2021Trial
- Effect of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: long-term follow-up of the randomised US PLCO cancer screening trial.The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019Trial
- Modeling in Colorectal Cancer Screening: Assessing External and Predictive Validity of MISCAN-Colon Microsimulation Model Using NORCCAP Trial Results.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2018Trial
- Prognostic Significance of Cdc42 Expression in Colorectal Cancer and Its Concordance Between Primary Tumors and Matched Metastases: A Retrospective Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Early-detection and prevention effects of screening sigmoidoscopy: evidence from randomized trials revisited.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Consequences of omitting additional treatment after local excision of high-risk early rectal cancer: a national cohort.International journal of colorectal disease · 2026Article
- Colorectal cancer screening and management in the aging society: a narrative review of benefit, risk, and the biological imperative for rural and community medicine.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2026Article
- Long-term effectiveness of endoscopic and stool-based colorectal cancer screening strategies: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2026Review
18 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
15 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Background: The long-term effects of sigmoidoscopy screening on colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality in women and men are unclear. Objective: To determine the effectiveness of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening after 15 years of follow-up in women and men. Design: Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00119912). Setting: Oslo and Telemark County, Norway. Participants: Adults aged 50 to 64 years at baseline without prior CRC. Intervention: Screening (between 1999 and 2001) with flexible sigmoidoscopy with and without additional fecal blood testing versus no screening. Participants with positive screening results were offered colonoscopy. Measurements: Age-adjusted CRC incidence and mortality stratified by sex. Results: Of 98 678 persons, 20 552 were randomly assigned to screening and 78 126 to no screening. Adherence rates were 64.7% in women and 61.4% in men. Median follow-up was 14.8 years. The absolute risks for CRC in women were 1.86% in the screening group and 2.05% in the control group (risk difference, -0.19 percentage point [95% CI, -0.49 to 0.11 percentage point]; HR, 0.92 [CI, 0.79 to 1.07]). In men, the corresponding risks were 1.72% and 2.50%, respectively (risk difference, -0.78 percentage point [CI, -1.08 to -0.48 percentage points]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.66 [CI, 0.57 to 0.78]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.004). The absolute risks for death from CRC in women were 0.60% in the screening group and 0.59% in the control group (risk difference, 0.01 percentage point [CI, -0.16 to 0.18 percentage point]; HR, 1.01 [CI, 0.77 to 1.33]). The corresponding risks for death from CRC in men were 0.49% and 0.81%, respectively (risk difference, -0.33 percentage point [CI, -0.49 to -0.16 percentage point]; HR, 0.63 [CI, 0.47 to 0.83]) (P for heterogeneity = 0.014). Limitation: Follow-up through national registries. Conclusion: Offering sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway reduced CRC incidence and mortality in men but had little or no effect in women. Primary Funding Source: Norwegian government and Norwegian Cancer Society.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.