Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710099›Full record

Trial reportJAMA neurology2018

Effect of Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-Targeted Motor Control Training on Chronic Spinal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Anneleen Malfliet, Jeroen Kregel, Iris Coppieters, Robby De Pauw, Mira Meeus, Nathalie Roussel, Barbara Cagnie, Lieven Danneels, Jo Nijs

Erratum issued 5 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 5 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 116 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
116citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02098005 nacompletednot on this map

A Modern Neuroscience Approach to Chronic Spinal Pain: Pain Neuroscience Education Combined With Cognition-targeted Motor Control Training

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2014 to 2016Enrolled120ConditionsChronic Spinal PainArmsusual care evidence-based physiotherapy, modern neuroscience approach
NCT05277077 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Pain Neuroscience Education Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair on Clinical Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorHacettepe UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled36ConditionsRotator Cuff Injuries, Tear, Pain, ShoulderArmsPain neuroscience education, Conventional treatment
NCT06502769 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Therapeutic Exercise and Pain Neurophysiology Education in Temporomandibular Disorders: a Single-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of AlcalaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled36ConditionsTemporomandibular DisorderArmsTherapeutic Exercise, Pain Neurophysiology Education
NCT07461298 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Multimodal Intervention Based on Pain Neuroscience Education, Therapeutic Exercise and Healthy Lifestyle Promotion in Patients With Persistent Musculoskeletal Pain in Primary Care: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversitat Jaume IRan2026 to 2028Enrolled146ConditionsChronic Musculoskeletal PainArmsMultimodal Pain Management Program, Usual Primary Care
NCT07743905 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArkansasRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Pain, Chronic Pain Due to Injury, Failed Back Syndrome, Persistent Spinal Pain SyndromeArmsSCS-PNE intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

116 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anneleen MalflietResearch Foundation-Flanders, Brussels, Belgium.
Jeroen KregelPain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Iris CoppietersPain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Robby De PauwDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus Heymans, Ghent, Belgium.
Mira MeeusPain in Motion International Research Group, Brussels, Belgium.
Nathalie RousselDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Antwerp, Belgium.
Barbara CagnieDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus Heymans, Ghent, Belgium.
Lieven DanneelsDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Campus Heymans, Ghent, Belgium.
Jo NijsDepartment of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Effective treatments for chronic spinal pain are essential to reduce the related high personal and socioeconomic costs. Objective: To compare pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training with current best-evidence physiotherapy for reducing pain and improving functionality, gray matter morphologic features, and pain cognitions in individuals with chronic spinal pain. Design, Setting, and Participants: Multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted from January 1, 2014, to January 30, 2017, among 120 patients with chronic nonspecific spinal pain in 2 outpatient hospitals with follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Interventions: Participants were randomized into an experimental group (combined pain neuroscience education and cognition-targeted motor control training) and a control group (combining education on back and neck pain and general exercise therapy). Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were pain (pressure pain thresholds, numeric rating scale, and central sensitization inventory) and function (pain disability index and mental health and physical health). Results: There were 22 men and 38 women in the experimental group (mean [SD] age, 39.9 [12.0] years) and 25 men and 35 women in the control group (mean [SD] age, 40.5 [12.9] years). Participants in the experimental group experienced reduced pain (small to medium effect sizes): higher pressure pain thresholds at primary test site at 3 months (estimated marginal [EM] mean, 0.971; 95% CI, -0.028 to 1.970) and reduced central sensitization inventory scores at 6 months (EM mean, -5.684; 95% CI, -10.589 to -0.780) and 12 months (EM mean, -6.053; 95% CI, -10.781 to -1.324). They also experienced improved function (small to medium effect sizes): significant and clinically relevant reduction of disability at 3 months (EM mean, -5.113; 95% CI, -9.994 to -0.232), 6 months (EM mean, -6.351; 95% CI, -11.153 to -1.550), and 12 months (EM mean, -5.779; 95% CI, -10.340 to -1.217); better mental health at 6 months (EM mean, 36.496; 95% CI, 7.998-64.995); and better physical health at 3 months (EM mean, 39.263; 95% CI, 9.644-66.882), 6 months (EM mean, 53.007; 95% CI, 23.805-82.209), and 12 months (EM mean, 32.208; 95% CI, 2.402-62.014). Conclusions and Relevance: Pain neuroscience education combined with cognition-targeted motor control training appears to be more effective than current best-evidence physiotherapy for improving pain, symptoms of central sensitization, disability, mental and physical functioning, and pain cognitions in individuals with chronic spinal pain. Significant clinical improvements without detectable changes in brain gray matter morphologic features calls into question the relevance of brain gray matter alterations in this population. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02098005.

Indexed as

Physical Therapy ModalitiesAdultBack PainCentral Nervous System SensitizationChronic PainCognitionExercise TherapyFailed Back Surgery SyndromeFemaleGray MatterHumansLow Back PainMaleMiddle AgedNeck PainNeurosciences

Identifiers

PMID29710099
PMCPMC6145763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.