Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29710075›Full record

Trial reportJAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery2018

Effect of Perioperative Gabapentin Use on Postsurgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Head and Neck Mucosal Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Melanie Townsend, Tina Liou, Dorina Kallogjeri, Morgan Schoer, Nicholas Scott-Wittenborn, Miranda Lindburg, Michael Bottros, Ryan S Jackson, Brian Nussenbaum, Jay F Piccirillo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02926573 (Perioperative Gabapentin Use In Head And Neck Mucosal Surgery Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02926573 phase4completednot on this map

Perioperative Gabapentin Use In Head And Neck Mucosal Surgery Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2016 to 2017Enrolled123ConditionsHead and Neck Cancer, Acute Pain, Postoperative PainArmsGabapentin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A retrospective analysis of pain and opioid usage in head and neck free flap reconstruction.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Melanie TownsendDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Tina LiouDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Dorina KallogjeriDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Morgan SchoerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Nicholas Scott-WittenbornDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Miranda LindburgDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Michael BottrosDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Ryan S JacksonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Brian NussenbaumDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Jay F PiccirilloDepartment of Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.
Washington University in St. Louis · USOffice of Multidisciplinary Activities · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Effective postoperative pain management increases patient satisfaction, reduces cost, reduces morbidity, and shortens hospitalizations. Previous studies investigating multimodal pain therapy in otolaryngology patients focused on homogenous patient groups with short postoperative follow-up times. Objective: To investigate the effect of perioperative gabapentin treatment on postsurgical pain in patients undergoing head and neck mucosal surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: Adults undergoing head and neck mucosal surgery from July 25, 2016, through June 19, 2017, were included in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial and randomized to receive gabapentin, 300 mg twice daily, or placebo before surgery and up to 72 hours after surgery. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcome was hourly narcotic use calculated in morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes included subjective visual analog scale pain scores captured for resting, coughing, and swallowing using a 0- to 100-mm scale (a 100-mm line anchored with no pain on the left end and worst possible pain on the right end). A change of 10 mm or more was deemed to be clinically meaningful. Additional secondary outcome measures included degree of pain control, patient satisfaction, and adverse effects. Results: Of the 110 patients randomized to receive gabapentin or placebo, 11 and 10 withdrew from each group, respectively. Ninety patients were then analyzed: 44 in the gabapentin group (mean [SD] age, 61.1 [10.0] years; 33 [75%] male; 40 [91%] white) and 46 in the placebo group (mean [SD] age, 60.9 [11.3] years; 35 [78%] male; 43 [94%] white). Both groups had similar self-reported levels of preoperative pain and narcotic effectiveness. A median difference of 0.26 mg/h of morphine (95% CI, -0.27 to 0.94 mg/h) was found between groups. After controlling for comorbidity and self-reported baseline pain levels, mixed model analysis found the difference in marginal means of visual analog scale scores between groups to be lower in the gabapentin group compared with the placebo group for all categories (rest difference, 7.9 mm; 95% CI, -0.4 to 16.2 mm; cough difference, 8.9 mm; 95% CI, -0.5 to 18.3 mm; swallow difference, 9.4 mm; 95% CI, -1.2 to 20.0 mm). More patients in the gabapentin group reported that pain was always well controlled than in the placebo group (difference, 9.2%; 95% CI, -21% to 3%). Gabapentin and placebo groups reported similar levels of satisfaction with pain control (difference, 2%; 95% CI, -11% to 15%). There was no clinically meaningful difference in reported nausea between the 2 groups (difference, 6%; 95% CI, -14% to 26%). Conclusion and Relevance: Perioperative gabapentin given 300 mg twice daily did not result in reduced narcotic use, but results were compatible with clinically meaningful reductions in pain scores. Satisfaction with pain control and adverse effects were similar between groups. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02926573.

Indexed as

AnalgesicsDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGabapentinHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative PainTreatment OutcomeAnalgesicsGabapentin

Identifiers

PMID29710075
PMCPMC6248193
OpenAlexW2800962296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.