Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29709573›Full record

ReviewNeurobiology of disease2019

Roles for neuronal and glial autophagy in synaptic pruning during development.

Ori J Lieberman, Avery F McGuirt, Guomei Tang, David Sulzer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurobiology of disease, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Synaptic promiscuity in brain development.Current biology : CB · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ori J LiebermanDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Avery F McGuirtDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
Guomei TangDepartment of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States.
David SulzerDepartment of Psychiatry, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States; Department of Pharmacology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, United States; Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, United States. Electronic address: ds43@cumc.columbia.edu.

Funding

The Dopamine Synapse and Associative LearningR01DA007418 · NIDA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI David Sulzer · 1999 to 2026
$9.4M
Development of Fluorescent False NeurotransmittersR01MH108186 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI SAMES, DALIBOR, SULZER, DAVID · 2015 to 2024
$5.8M
Cellular and Molecular Basis for Cognitive Impairment Associated with Glucocerebrosidase (GBA1) MutationR01NS104390 · NINDS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TANG, GUOMEI · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Mitochondrial dysfunction due to aberrant mTOR-regulated mitophagy in autismK01MH096956 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI TANG, GUOMEI · 2013 to 2016
$734k
Regulation of striatal maturation by dopamine and macroautophagy: implications for neuropsychiatric disordersF30MH114390 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI LIEBERMAN, ORI J · 2017 to 2020
$181k
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA007418NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH114390NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH096956NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH108186NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104390
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dendritic protrusions known as spines represent the primary postsynaptic location for excitatory synapses. Dendritic spines are critical for many synaptic functions, and their formation, modification, and turnover are thought to be important for mechanisms of learning and memory. At many excitatory synapses, dendritic spines form during the early postnatal period, and while many spines are likely being formed and removed throughout life, the net number are often gradually "pruned" during adolescence to reach a stable level in the adult. In neurodevelopmental disorders, spine pruning is disrupted, emphasizing the importance of understanding its governing processes. Autophagy, a process through which cytosolic components and organelles are degraded, has recently been shown to control spine pruning in the mouse cortex, but the mechanisms through which autophagy acts remain obscure. Here, we draw on three widely studied prototypical synaptic pruning events to focus on two governing principles of spine pruning: 1) activity-dependent synaptic competition and 2) non-neuronal contributions. We briefly review what is known about autophagy in the central nervous system and its regulation by metabolic kinases. We propose a model in which autophagy in both neurons and non-neuronal cells contributes to spine pruning, and how other processes that regulate spine pruning could intersect with autophagy. We further outline future research directions to address outstanding questions on the role of autophagy in synaptic pruning.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutophagyCentral Nervous SystemHumansNeurogliaNeuronsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID29709573
PMCPMC6204314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.