ReviewWiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology2018
Making lineage decisions with biological noise: Lessons from the early mouse embryo.
Review in Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
36 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inter-individual gene expression variability implies stable regulation of brain-biased genes across organs in three ray-finned fishes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Ribosomal modifications are associated with mesenchymal fate selection in the neural crest lineage.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Embryonic signatures of intergenerational epigenetic inheritance across paternal environments and genetic backgrounds.The EMBO journal · 2025Article
- Timing is everything: transcription bursting in development.Genes & development · 2025Review
- Noise-driven morphogenesis independent of transcriptional regulatory programs.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Uncovering candidate Nanog-Helper genes in early mouse embryo differentiation using differential entropy and network inference.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- AI-powered simulation-based inference of a genuinely spatial-stochastic gene regulation model of early mouse embryogenesis.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- A logic-incorporated gene regulatory network deciphers principles in cell fate decisions.eLife · 2024Article
- A geometrical model of cell fate specification in the mouse blastocyst.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Article
- Codon-optimization in gene therapy: promises, prospects and challenges.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- The aryl hydrocarbon receptor directs the differentiation of murine progenitor blastomeres.Cell biology and toxicology · 2023Article
- Noncoding RNA circuitry in melanoma onset, plasticity, and therapeutic response.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2023Review
- Tissues as networks of cells: towards generative rules of complex organ development.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Review
- Automated time-lapse data segmentation reveals in vivo cell state dynamics.Science advances · 2023Article
- A single-cell, time-resolved profiling ofScience advances · 2023Article
- Review
- The physiological and pathological mechanisms of early embryonic development.Fundamental research · 2022Review
- Initial source of heterogeneity in a model for cell fate decision in the early mammalian embryo.Interface focus · 2022Article
- NANOG initiates epiblast fate through the coordination of pluripotency genes expression.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding how individual cells make fate decisions that lead to the faithful formation and homeostatic maintenance of tissues is a fundamental goal of contemporary developmental and stem cell biology. Seemingly uniform populations of stem cells and multipotent progenitors display a surprising degree of heterogeneity, primarily originating from the inherent stochastic nature of molecular processes underlying gene expression. Despite this heterogeneity, lineage decisions result in tissues of a defined size and with consistent proportions of differentiated cell types. Using the early mouse embryo as a model we review recent developments that have allowed the quantification of molecular intercellular heterogeneity during cell differentiation. We first discuss the relationship between these heterogeneities and developmental cellular potential. We then review recent theoretical approaches that formalize the mechanisms underlying fate decisions in the inner cell mass of the blastocyst stage embryo. These models build on our extensive knowledge of the genetic control of fate decisions in this system and will become essential tools for a rigorous understanding of the connection between noisy molecular processes and reproducible outcomes at the multicellular level. We conclude by suggesting that cell-to-cell communication provides a mechanism to exploit and buffer intercellular variability in a self-organized process that culminates in the reproducible formation of the mature mammalian blastocyst stage embryo that is ready for implantation into the maternal uterus. This article is categorized under: Gene Expression and Transcriptional Hierarchies > Cellular Differentiation Establishment of Spatial and Temporal Patterns > Regulation of Size, Proportion, and Timing Gene Expression and Transcriptional Hierarchies > Gene Networks and Genomics Gene Expression and Transcriptional Hierarchies > Quantitative Methods and Models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.