Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29709030›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Initial evaluation of thyroid dysfunction - Are simultaneous TSH and fT4 tests necessary?

Claudio Schneider, Martin Feller, Douglas C Bauer, Tinh-Hai Collet, Bruno R da Costa, Reto Auer, Robin P Peeters, Suzanne J Brown, Alexandra P Bremner, Peter C O'Leary and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Subclinical thyroid dysfunction, bone mineral density, and osteoporosis in a middle-aged Korean population.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Claudio SchneiderDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4350-9697
Martin FellerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Douglas C BauerDepartments of Medicine and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, United States.
Tinh-Hai ColletService of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Bruno R da CostaService of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Reto AuerInstitute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4222-4849
Robin P PeetersDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Suzanne J BrownDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Alexandra P BremnerSchool of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Peter C O'LearySchool of Women's and Infants' Health, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Peter FeddemaDiagnostica Stago, Doncaster, Victoria, Australia.
Peter J LeedmanMedical School, University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, Australia.
Drahomir AujeskyDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
John P WalshDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia.
Nicolas RodondiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGuidelines for thyroid function evaluation recommend testing TSH first, then assessing fT4 only if TSH is out of the reference range (two-step), but many clinicians initially request both TSH and fT4 (one-step). Given limitations of previous studies, we aimed to compare the two-step with the one-step approach in an unselected community-dwelling study population, and develop a prediction score based on clinical parameters that could identify at-risk patients for thyroid dysfunction.

designCross-sectional analysis of the population-based Busselton Health Study.

methodsWe compared the two-step with the one-step approach, focusing on cases that would be missed by the two-step approach, i.e. those with normal TSH, but out-of-range fT4. We used likelihood ratio tests to identify demographic and clinical parameters associated with thyroid dysfunction and developed a clinical prediction score by using a beta-coefficient based scoring method.

resultsFollowing the two-step approach, 93.0% of all 4471 participants had normal TSH and would not need further testing. The two-step approach would have missed 3.8% of all participants (169 of 4471) with a normal TSH, but a fT4 outside the reference range. In 85% (144 of 169) of these cases, fT4 fell within 2 pmol/l of fT4 reference range limits, consistent with healthy outliers. The clinical prediction score that performed best excluded only 22.5% of participants from TSH testing.

conclusionThe two-step approach may avoid measuring fT4 in as many as 93% of individuals with a very small risk of missing thyroid dysfunction. Our findings do not support the simultaneous initial measurement of both TSH and fT4.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansHyperthyroidismHypothyroidismLikelihood FunctionsMaleMiddle AgedReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityThyroid DiseasesThyrotropinThyroxine

Identifiers

PMID29709030
PMCPMC5927436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.