Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29708997›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Effect of post-discharge virtual wards on improving outcomes in heart failure and non-heart failure populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kelsey Uminski, Paul Komenda, Reid Whitlock, Thomas Ferguson, Stewart Nadurak, Laura Hochheim, Navdeep Tangri, Claudio Rigatto

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Barriers and facilitators to the use of virtual wards: a systematic review of the qualitative evidence.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelsey UminskiMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Paul KomendaMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Reid WhitlockChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada.
Thomas FergusonChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada.
Stewart NadurakChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada.
Laura HochheimChronic Disease Innovation Centre, Seven Oaks General Hospital, Winnipeg, Canada.
Navdeep TangriMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Claudio RigattoMax Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8306-8072
Seven Oaks General Hospital · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUnplanned hospital admissions in high-risk patients are common and costly in an increasingly frail chronic disease population. Virtual Wards (VW) are an emerging concept to improve outcomes in these patients. PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of post-discharge VWs, as an alternative to usual community based care, on hospital readmissions and mortality among heart failure and non-heart failure populations. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, SCOPUS and CINAHL, from inception through to Jan 31, 2017; unpublished data, prior systematic reviews; reference lists. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized trials of post-discharge VW versus community based, usual care that reported all-cause hospital readmission and mortality outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were reviewed for inclusion and independently extracted by two reviewers. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. DATA SYNTHESIS: In patients with heart failure, a post-discharge VW reduced risk of mortality (six trials, n = 1634; RR 0.59, 95% CI = 0.44-0.78). Heart failure related readmissions were reduced (RR 0.61, 95% CI = 0.49-0.76), although all-cause readmission was not. In contrast, a post-discharge VW did not reduce death or hospital readmissions for patients with undifferentiated high-risk chronic diseases (four trials, n = .3186). LIMITATIONS: Heterogeneity with respect to intervention and comparator, lacking consistent descriptions and utilization of standardized nomenclature for VW. Some trials had methodologic shortcomings and relatively small study populations.

conclusionsA post-discharge VW can provide added benefits to usual community based care to reduce all-cause mortality and heart failure-related hospital admissions among patients with heart failure. Further research is needed to evaluate the utility of VWs in other chronic disease settings.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient DischargeChronic DiseaseContinuity of Patient CareHeart FailureHumansLength of StayPatient Readmission

Identifiers

PMID29708997
PMCPMC5927407
OpenAlexW2801427859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.