Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29708963›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2018

Automated evaluation of quaternary structures from protein crystals.

Spencer Bliven, Aleix Lafita, Althea Parker, Guido Capitani, Jose M Duarte

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Scotty: lattice coincidences in the Protein Data Bank.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Retinal pigment epithelium 65 kDa protein (RPE65): An update.Progress in retinal and eye research · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Spencer BlivenLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-1200-1698
Aleix LafitaLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1549-3162
Althea ParkerLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Guido CapitaniLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.
Jose M DuarteLaboratory of Biomolecular Research, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9544-5621

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A correct assessment of the quaternary structure of proteins is a fundamental prerequisite to understanding their function, physico-chemical properties and mode of interaction with other proteins. Currently about 90% of structures in the Protein Data Bank are crystal structures, in which the correct quaternary structure is embedded in the crystal lattice among a number of crystal contacts. Computational methods are required to 1) classify all protein-protein contacts in crystal lattices as biologically relevant or crystal contacts and 2) provide an assessment of how the biologically relevant interfaces combine into a biological assembly. In our previous work we addressed the first problem with our EPPIC (Evolutionary Protein Protein Interface Classifier) method. Here, we present our solution to the second problem with a new method that combines the interface classification results with symmetry and topology considerations. The new algorithm enumerates all possible valid assemblies within the crystal using a graph representation of the lattice and predicts the most probable biological unit based on the pairwise interface scoring. Our method achieves 85% precision (ranging from 76% to 90% for different oligomeric types) on a new dataset of 1,481 biological assemblies with consensus of PDB annotations. Although almost the same precision is achieved by PISA, currently the most popular quaternary structure assignment method, we show that, due to the fundamentally different approach to the problem, the two methods are complementary and could be combined to improve biological assembly assignments. The software for the automatic assessment of protein assemblies (EPPIC version 3) has been made available through a web server at http://www.eppic-web.org.

Indexed as

Protein Structure, QuaternaryAlgorithmsComputational BiologyCrystallography, X-RayDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProteinsSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID29708963
PMCPMC5945228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.