Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29708778›Full record

SynthesisFoodborne pathogens and disease2018

Are Food Animals Responsible for Transfer of Antimicrobial-Resistant Escherichia coli or Their Resistance Determinants to Human Populations? A Systematic Review.

Dishon Muloi, Melissa J Ward, Amy B Pedersen, Eric M Fèvre, Mark E J Woolhouse, Bram A D van Bunnik

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Foodborne pathogens and disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 159 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Phenotypic and Molecular Study of Multidrug-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dishon Muloi1 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom .
Melissa J Ward2 Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom .
Amy B Pedersen2 Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom .
Eric M Fèvre4 Institute of Infection and Global Health, University of Liverpool , Liverpool, United Kingdom .
Mark E J Woolhouse1 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom .
Bram A D van Bunnik1 Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences & Informatics, University of Edinburgh , Edinburgh, United Kingdom .
Centre for Immunity, Infection and Evolution · GBUniversity of Edinburgh · GBInternational Livestock Research Institute · KE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L019019/1Medical Research Council G1100783Medical Research Council MR/R000093/1Medical Research Council MR/R015090/1Wellcome Trust WT103953MA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of farm animals in the emergence and dissemination of both AMR bacteria and their resistance determinants to humans is poorly understood and controversial. Here, we systematically reviewed the current evidence that food animals are responsible for transfer of AMR to humans. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE for literature published between 1940 and 2016. Our results show that eight studies (18%) suggested evidence of transmission of AMR from food animals to humans, 25 studies (56%) suggested transmission between animals and humans with no direction specified and 12 studies (26%) did not support transmission. Quality of evidence was variable among the included studies; one study (2%) used high resolution typing tools, 36 (80%) used intermediate resolution typing tools, six (13%) relied on low resolution typing tools, and two (5%) based conclusions on co-occurrence of resistance. While some studies suggested to provide evidence that transmission of AMR from food animals to humans may occur, robust conclusions on the directionality of transmission cannot be drawn due to limitations in study methodologies. Our findings highlight the need to combine high resolution genomic data analysis with systematically collected epidemiological evidence to reconstruct patterns of AMR transmission between food animals and humans.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFood MicrobiologyAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsantimicrobial resistanceEscherichia colifood animalshumanssystematic review

Identifiers

PMID29708778
PMCPMC6103250
OpenAlexW2800429199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.