ArticleStudies in family planning2018
Revising the FP Quality of Care Framework in the Context of Rights-based Family Planning.
Article in Studies in family planning, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparability of family planning quality of care measurement tools in low-and-middle income country settings: a systematic review.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Trial
- Trial
- Closing the counselling gap: a qualitative study to strengthen rights-based family planning in Pakistan.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Family planning service quality and contraceptive discontinuation among short-acting contraceptive users in Indonesia: a survival analysis of the 2017 Indonesia demographic health survey.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Woman-centeredness of family planning care and associated factors in a semi-urban health district in West Cameroon.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Contraceptive choices in Karachi: a phenomenological analysis of women's perspectives on the quality of family planning services in low-income urban areas.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Article
- Moving Past a Legacy of Controlling Women: Key Frameworks to Center Women and Girls' Choice and Agency in Sexual and Reproductive Health Measurement.Studies in family planning · 2025Article
- Article
- Exploring opportunities to enhance the quality of pharmacy-based contraceptive service delivery for adolescents and young women in Kenya: a multimethod qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Readiness of health facilities to deliver family planning services and associated factors in urban east-central Uganda.Reproductive health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of comprehensive abortion care service in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital in Northwest Ethiopia: mixed case study design.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Assessing the availability and scope of routine data on post-pregnancy family planning: A cross-sectional review of registers and reporting tools in 18 low- and middle-income countries.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Predictors of quality of family planning counselling in Ethiopia: multilevel analysis of the SPA survey 2021/22.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2025Article
- Missed opportunities of method information index plus (MII+) counseling among current modern contraceptive users. multi-level analysis from the Ethiopian PMA 2021 data set.BMC public health · 2024Article
- PrEP Method Switching: Will it Yield Greater Coverage of HIV Protection? Applying Lessons Learned from Family Planning to Guide Future Research in the Context of PrEP Choice.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2024Review
- Understanding the association between family planning and fertility reduction in Southeast Asia: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Conceptualizing Contraceptive Agency: A Critical Step to Enable Human Rights-Based Family Planning Programs and Measurement.Global health, science and practice · 2024Article
- Balancing client preferences and population-level goals: a qualitative study of the ways in which public health providers and facility administrators interpret and incentivise quality of care in contraceptive counselling in Ethiopia, Mexico and India.Sexual and reproductive health matters · 2023Article
5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedErratum.2018
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nearly three decades ago, Bruce articulated a client-centered quality of care (QoC) framework for family planning services. The term quality has since then been used in many rights-based frameworks for health, reproductive health, and family planning. This commentary compares the concept of quality used in many of these frameworks to reconcile the elements of the FP QoC framework with the use of quality in various rights frameworks. We propose five modifications to the original FP QoC framework to better align it with the treatment of quality in the rights-based approaches and the way quality in family planning has been applied in practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.