Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29708087›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2018

Determinants of folic acid supplement use outside national recommendations for pregnant women: results from the Growing Up in New Zealand cohort study.

Juliana A Teixeira, Teresa G Castro, Clare R Wall, Dirce Maria Marchioni, Sarah Berry, Susan Mb Morton, Cameron C Grant

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Juliana A Teixeira1Department of Nutrition,School of Public Health,University of São Paulo,São Paulo,Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-8155-1362
Teresa G Castro2The Centre for Longitudinal Research - He Ara ki Mua,School of Population Health (Building 730, Level 3),Tamaki Campus,University of Auckland,261 Morrin Road,St Johns,Auckland 1072,New Zealand.
Clare R Wall2The Centre for Longitudinal Research - He Ara ki Mua,School of Population Health (Building 730, Level 3),Tamaki Campus,University of Auckland,261 Morrin Road,St Johns,Auckland 1072,New Zealand.
Dirce Maria Marchioni1Department of Nutrition,School of Public Health,University of São Paulo,São Paulo,Brazil.
Sarah Berry2The Centre for Longitudinal Research - He Ara ki Mua,School of Population Health (Building 730, Level 3),Tamaki Campus,University of Auckland,261 Morrin Road,St Johns,Auckland 1072,New Zealand.
Susan Mb Morton2The Centre for Longitudinal Research - He Ara ki Mua,School of Population Health (Building 730, Level 3),Tamaki Campus,University of Auckland,261 Morrin Road,St Johns,Auckland 1072,New Zealand.
Cameron C Grant2The Centre for Longitudinal Research - He Ara ki Mua,School of Population Health (Building 730, Level 3),Tamaki Campus,University of Auckland,261 Morrin Road,St Johns,Auckland 1072,New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the sociodemographic and lifestyle factors associated with insufficient and excessive use of folic acid supplements (FAS) among pregnant women.

designA pregnancy cohort to which multinomial logistic regression models were applied to identify factors associated with duration and dose of FAS use.

settingThe Growing Up in New Zealand child study, which enrolled pregnant women whose children were born in 2009-2010. SUBJECTS: Pregnant women (n 6822) enrolled into a nationally generalizable cohort.

resultsNinety-two per cent of pregnant women were not taking FAS according to the national recommendation (4 weeks before until 12 weeks after conception), with 69 % taking insufficient FAS and 57 % extending FAS use past 13 weeks' gestation. The factors associated with extended use differed from those associated with insufficient use. Consistent with published literature, the relative risks of insufficient use were increased for younger women, those with less education, of non-European ethnicities, unemployed, who smoked cigarettes, whose pregnancy was unplanned or who had older children, or were living in more deprived households. In contrast, the relative risks of extended use were increased for women of higher socio-economic status or for whom this was their first pregnancy and decreased for women of Pacific v. European ethnicity.

conclusionsIn New Zealand, current use of FAS during pregnancy potentially exposes pregnant women and their unborn children to too little or too much folic acid. Further policy development is necessary to reduce current socio-economic inequities in the use of FAS.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsFolic AcidHealth BehaviorAdultCohort StudiesFemaleHumansNew ZealandPregnancyPublic HealthFolic AcidFolic acid supplementationGrowing Up in New ZealandHealth behaviourPregnancyPublic health

Identifiers

PMID29708087
PMCPMC11106014
OpenAlexW2802364803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.