ArticleTrends in hearing
A New Method for Assessing Masking and Residual Inhibition of Tinnitus.
Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- The longer, the better? Investigating the effect of prolonged acoustic stimulation on brief acoustic tinnitus suppression.BMC neurology · 2026Trial
- Investigation of the effectiveness of sound enrichment in the treatment of tinnitus due to hearing loss.Brain and behavior · 2024Trial
- Impact of Hearing Aid Amplification on Subjective Tonal Tinnitus in Patients with Gently Sloping and Ski-Slope Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Audiology research · 2025Article
- Prediction of acoustic tinnitus suppression using resting-state EEG via explainable AI approach.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Pilot Study to Evaluate a Residual Inhibition Technique in Hearing Aids for Suppression of Tinnitus.Seminars in hearing · 2024Review
- History of Tinnitus Research at the VA National Center for Rehabilitative Auditory Research (NCRAR), 1997-2021: Studies and Key Findings.Seminars in hearing · 2024Review
- EEG spectral and microstate analysis originating residual inhibition of tinnitus induced by tailor-made notched music training.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Article
- Combined Amplification and Sound Therapy for Individuals With Tinnitus and Coexisting Hearing Loss: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The journal of international advanced otology · 2021Article
- Multidisciplinary Tinnitus Research: Challenges and Future Directions From the Perspective of Early Stage Researchers.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2021Review
- Comparison of Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss with Tinnitus and Short-Term Tinnitus.Neural plasticity · 2021Article
- Amplitude Modulated Noise for Tinnitus Suppression in Tonal and Noise-Like Tinnitus.Audiology & neuro-otology · 2019Article
- Comparison of Amplitude Modulated Sounds and Pure Tones at the Tinnitus Frequency: Residual Tinnitus Suppression and Stimulus Evaluation.Trends in hearingArticle
- Susceptibility to Residual Inhibition Is Associated With Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Chronicity.Trends in hearingArticle
- Article
- Comparing Three Established Methods for Tinnitus Pitch Matching With Respect to Reliability, Matching Duration, and Subjective Satisfaction.Trends in hearingArticle
- Comparing Tinnitus Tuning Curves and Psychoacoustic Tuning Curves.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tinnitus masking and residual inhibition (RI) are two well-known psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. While it has long been suggested that they may provide diagnostic and prognostic information, these measures are still rarely performed in clinics, as they are too time consuming. Given this issue, the main goal of the present study was to validate a new method for assessing these measures. An acoustic sequence made of pulsed stimuli, which included a fixed stimulus duration and interstimulus interval, was applied to 68 tinnitus patients at two testing sites. First, the minimum masking level (MML) was measured by raising the stimulus intensity until the tinnitus was unheard during the stimulus presentation. Second, the level of the stimulus was further increased until the tinnitus was suppressed during the silence interval between the acoustic pulses. This level was called the minimum residual inhibition level (MRIL). The sequential measurement of MML and MRIL from the same stimulus condition offers several advantages such as time efficiency and the ability to compare results between the MRIL and MML. Our study confirms that, from this new approach, MML and MRIL can be easily and quickly obtained from a wide variety of patients displaying either normal hearing or different hearing loss configurations. Indeed, MML was obtained in all patients except one (98.5%), and some level of MRIL was found on 59 patients (86.7%). More so, this approach allows the categorization of tinnitus patients into different subgroups based on the properties of their MRIL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.