Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29708062›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

A New Method for Assessing Masking and Residual Inhibition of Tinnitus.

Philippe Fournier, Anne-Flore Cuvillier, Stéphane Gallego, Fabien Paolino, Michel Paolino, Anne Quemar, Alain Londero, Arnaud Norena

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Philippe Fournier1 27051 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique , Aix-Marseille University, France.
Anne-Flore Cuvillier1 27051 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique , Aix-Marseille University, France.
Stéphane Gallego2 Institut des Sciences et Techniques de la Réadaptation, Lyon, France.
Fabien Paolino4 56173 Hôpital Privé Clairval , Explorations Oto-Neurologiques et Réhabilitation des Troubles de l'Equilibre, Marseille, France.
Michel Paolino4 56173 Hôpital Privé Clairval , Explorations Oto-Neurologiques et Réhabilitation des Troubles de l'Equilibre, Marseille, France.
Anne Quemar4 56173 Hôpital Privé Clairval , Explorations Oto-Neurologiques et Réhabilitation des Troubles de l'Equilibre, Marseille, France.
Alain Londero5 55647 Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou , France.
Arnaud Norena1 27051 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique , Aix-Marseille University, France.

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tinnitus masking and residual inhibition (RI) are two well-known psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. While it has long been suggested that they may provide diagnostic and prognostic information, these measures are still rarely performed in clinics, as they are too time consuming. Given this issue, the main goal of the present study was to validate a new method for assessing these measures. An acoustic sequence made of pulsed stimuli, which included a fixed stimulus duration and interstimulus interval, was applied to 68 tinnitus patients at two testing sites. First, the minimum masking level (MML) was measured by raising the stimulus intensity until the tinnitus was unheard during the stimulus presentation. Second, the level of the stimulus was further increased until the tinnitus was suppressed during the silence interval between the acoustic pulses. This level was called the minimum residual inhibition level (MRIL). The sequential measurement of MML and MRIL from the same stimulus condition offers several advantages such as time efficiency and the ability to compare results between the MRIL and MML. Our study confirms that, from this new approach, MML and MRIL can be easily and quickly obtained from a wide variety of patients displaying either normal hearing or different hearing loss configurations. Indeed, MML was obtained in all patients except one (98.5%), and some level of MRIL was found on 59 patients (86.7%). More so, this approach allows the categorization of tinnitus patients into different subgroups based on the properties of their MRIL.

Indexed as

Perceptual MaskingPsychoacousticsTinnitusAdolescentAdultAgedAudiometryFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultmaskingminimum masking levelpsychoacousticsresidual inhibitiontinnitus

Identifiers

PMID29708062
PMCPMC5949940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.