Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707798›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2018

Exposure, hazard, and survival analysis of diffusion on social networks.

Jiacheng Wu, Forrest W Crawford, David A Kim, Derek Stafford, Nicholas A Christakis

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Collective communication and behaviour in response to uncertain 'Danger' in network experiments.Proceedings. Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiacheng WuDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.
Forrest W CrawfordDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0046-0547
David A KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0151-5121
Derek StaffordDepartment of Political Science, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Nicholas A ChristakisDepartment of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5547-1086

Funding

Using Coincidence Analysis to Investigate Factors Affecting PrEP Initiation and Continuation in Southern ending the Epidemic CountiesP30MH062294 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John Edward Pachankis · 2001 to 2026
$48.5M
The Spread of Health Behaviors in the Framingham Heart Study Social NetworkP01AG031093 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MCGUIRE, THOMAS G. · 2008 to 2012
$10.7M
Roybal Center for Translational Research on AgingP30AG034420 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CHRISTAKIS, NICHOLAS A · 2009 to 2018
$3.3M
Yale University Clinical and Translational Science Award ProgramKL2TR000140 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHERWIN, ROBERT S · 2012 to 2015
$2.9M
Network-based epidemiology for hidden and hard-to-reach populationsDP2HD091799 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CRAWFORD, FORREST WRENN · 2016 to 2016
$2.5M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR000140NIA NIH HHS P01 AG031093NIA NIH HHS P30 AG034420NICHD NIH HHS DP2 HD091799NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sociologists, economists, epidemiologists, and others recognize the importance of social networks in the diffusion of ideas and behaviors through human societies. To measure the flow of information on real-world networks, researchers often conduct comprehensive sociometric mapping of social links between individuals and then follow the spread of an "innovation" from reports of adoption or change in behavior over time. The innovation is introduced to a small number of individuals who may also be encouraged to spread it to their network contacts. In conjunction with the known social network, the pattern of adoptions gives researchers insight into the spread of the innovation in the population and factors associated with successful diffusion. Researchers have used widely varying statistical tools to estimate these quantities, and there is disagreement about how to analyze diffusion on fully observed networks. Here, we describe a framework for measuring features of diffusion processes on social networks using the epidemiological concepts of exposure and competing risks. Given a realization of a diffusion process on a fully observed network, we show that classical survival regression models can be adapted to estimate the rate of diffusion, and actor/edge attributes associated with successful transmission or adoption, while accounting for the topology of the social network. We illustrate these tools by applying them to a randomized network intervention trial conducted in Honduras to estimate the rate of adoption of 2 health-related interventions-multivitamins and chlorine bleach for water purification-and determine factors associated with successful social transmission.

Indexed as

Logistic ModelsProportional Hazards ModelsSocial NetworkingComputer SimulationEnvironmental ExposureHumansRegression AnalysisSurvival Analysiscompeting risksdiffusion of innovationssocial network

Identifiers

PMID29707798
PMCPMC6933552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.