ArticleStem cell reviews and reports2018
Comparison of Human Denuded Amniotic Membrane and Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa as Scaffolds for Limbal Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Article in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- UTP increases wound healing in the self assembled skin substitute (SASS).Journal of cell communication and signaling · 2023Article
- Developing a pro-angiogenic placenta derived amniochorionic scaffold with two exposed basement membranes as substrates for cultivating endothelial cells.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Submicron spatial resolution optical coherence tomography for visualising the 3D structures of cells cultivated in complex culture systems.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Immortalization of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells by TERT Affects Adenosine Metabolism and Impairs their Immunosuppressive Capacity.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2020Article
- Cell spheroid fusion: beyond liquid drops model.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Twenty years of limbal epithelial therapy: an update on managing limbal stem cell deficiency.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Blinding corneal scarring is usually treated with allogeneic graft tissue. Nevertheless, the global shortage of donors leaves millions of patients in need of therapy. Traditional tissue engineering strategies involves the combination of cells, growth factors, and scaffolds that can supply cellular biological components allowing to restore the tissue function. The mesenchymal stem cells found in the limbal stroma (L-MSCs) have a self-renewal potential for multilineage differentiation. Thus, in this work we compared the potential of human amniotic membrane (hAM) and porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) as scaffolds for L-MSCs, aiming at potential applications in corneal regeneration. For that, L-MSCs were seeded on hAM and SIS and we analyzed their viability, actin cytoskeleton, nuclei morphology, cell density, adhesion and surface markers. Our results showed that cells adhered and integrated into both membranes with a high cell density, an important characteristic for cell therapy. However, due to its transparency, the hAM allowed a better observation of L-MSCs. In addition, the analysis of surface markers expression on L-MSCs after two weeks showed a slight increase in the percentages of negative markers for MSCs grown on SIS membrane. Thus, considering a long-term culture, the hAM was considered better in maintaining the MSCs phenotype. Regarding the function as scaffolds, SIS was as efficient as the amniotic membrane, considering that these two types of biological matrices maintained the cell viability, actin cytoskeleton, nuclei morphology and mesenchymal phenotype, without causing cell death. Therefore, our data in vitro provides evidence for future pre-clinical studies were these membranes can be used as a support to transport mesenchymal stem cells to the injured area, creating a kind of temporary curative, allowing the release of bioactive molecules, such as cytokines and growth factors and then promoting the tissue regeneration, both in human and veterinary medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.