ArticleCurrent medical mycology2017
Microsatellite genotyping of clinical Candida parapsilosis isolates.
Article in Current medical mycology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative genotypic analysis of Candida krusei and Candida parapsilosis isolates from human and animal clinical samples through MLVA and RAPD-PCR profiling.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2026Article
- Article
- Molecular Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Antifungal susceptibility pattern and biofilm-related genes expression in planktonic and biofilm cells ofCurrent medical mycology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeMATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted on 81 independent clinical
resultsThe short tandem repeat (STR) typing of clinical
conclusionAs the findings indicated, the clinical
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.