Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707661›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2017

VIM-

R Herruzo, G Ruiz, S Gallego, J Diez, A Sarria, F Omeñaca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Carbapenemase-producingEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  2. Global genomic landscape of theNew microbes and new infections · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Epidemic Characteristics of Carbapenem-ResistantInfection and drug resistance · 2020
    Article
  10. First Italian outbreak of VIM-producingWorld journal of clinical cases · 2019
    Article
  11. [Evolution of the incidence of colonized and infected patients by VIM carbapenemase-producing bacteria in a pediatric hospital in Spain].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R HerruzoDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health and Microbiology, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Spain.
G RuizMicrobiology Service, Universitary Hospital "La Paz", Madrid, Spain.
S GallegoPreventive Medicine Service, Universitary Hospital "La Paz", Madrid, Spain.
J DiezPreventive Medicine Service, Universitary Hospital "La Paz", Madrid, Spain.
A SarriaMicrobiology Service, Universitary Hospital "La Paz", Madrid, Spain.
F OmeñacaNeonatology Service, Children Hospital.Universitary Hospital "La Paz", Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe describe an outbreak of VIM-carbapenemase Klebsiella oxytoca (VIM-Kox) in a NICU. MATERIALS AND

methodsProspective Epidemiological Surveillance:Systematically (weekly screening cultures) or on admission, if the patient had a history of previous colonization by VIM-Kox.Clinical cultures, done if infection was suspected.Other possible microorganism sources were investigated: their mothers (rectal microbiota), milk packages and preparation apparata in the lactodietary section, echocardiagram transductors, cribs, the sinks (faucets and drains), washing bowls, etc.Molecular typing was performed using the DiversiLab (bioMérieux) system on all VIM-Kox isolated from environment or patients (one by neonate).

resultsWe identified 20 VIM-Kox cases, the most only presented colonization, but 4 showed infection. Three of the ten sinks (drains) in our NICU, were positive for VIM-Kox. Another four drains harbored P.aeruginosa, S. maltophilia and/or Enterobacter sp. Nevertheless the VIM-Kox bacteria in the sinks (drains) were not the same as those in the patients, who showed three different strains.

conclusionsA VIM-Kox colonization or infection outbreak in a NICU is described. Rather than environment, not even drains, the source of the outbreak was other patients. The outbreak was relatively brief, as a result of the rapidness with which appropriate measures were taken and followed.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksEquipment ContaminationIntensive Care Units, NeonatalBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasesCross InfectionEquipment and Supplies, HospitalFemaleHospitals, PediatricHumansInfant, NewbornInfection ControlKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella oxytocaMaleProspective StudiesBacterial Proteinsbeta-LactamasescarbapenemaseNICUSink (drain)VIM-Klebsiella oxytoca

Identifiers

PMID29707661
PMCPMC5912795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.