Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707575›Full record

Observational studyBioMed research international2018

Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography versus Dye Angiography in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Sensitivity and Specificity Analysis.

Eleni Nikolopoulou, Massimo Lorusso, Luisa Micelli Ferrari, Maria Vittoria Cicinelli, Francesco Bandello, Giuseppe Querques, Tommaso Micelli Ferrari

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BioMed research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Sensitivity and specificity of optical coherence tomography angiography in the diagnosis of active choroidal neovascularization: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. OCTA in age-related macular degeneration: consensus on practical guidelines for optimal imaging strategies across different clinical scenarios.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Eleni NikolopoulouDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ente Ecclesiastico Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
Massimo LorussoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ente Ecclesiastico Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
Luisa Micelli FerrariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ente Ecclesiastico Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.
Maria Vittoria CicinelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.
Francesco BandelloDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3238-9682
Giuseppe QuerquesDepartment of Ophthalmology, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3292-9581
Tommaso Micelli FerrariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ente Ecclesiastico Ospedale Generale Regionale "F. Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOptical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) could be a valid tool to detect choroidal neovascularization (CNV) in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD), allowing the analysis of the type, the morphology, and the extension of CNV in most of the cases. PURPOSE: To determine the sensitivity and specificity of OCTA in detecting CNV secondary to nAMD, compared to fluorescein angiography (FA) and indocyanine green angiography (ICGA).

methodsProspective observational study. Patients with suspected nAMD were recruited between May and December 2016. Patients underwent FA, ICGA, spectral domain OCT, and OCTA (AngioVue, Optovue, Inc.). Sensitivity and specificity of FA, with or without ICGA, were assessed and compared with OCTA.

resultsSeventy eyes of 70 consecutive patients were included: 32 eyes (45.7%) with type I CNV, 8 eyes (11.4%) with type II CNV, 4 eyes (5.7%) with type III CNV, 6 eyes (8.6%) with mixed type I and type II CNV, and 20 eyes (28.6%) with no CNV. Sensitivity of OCTA was 88% and specificity was 90%. Concordance between FA/ICGA and OCTA was very good (0,91; range 0,81-1,00).

conclusionsOCTA showed high sensitivity and specificity for detection of CNV. Concordance between OCTA and gold-standard dye-based techniques was excellent. OCTA may represent a first-line noninvasive method for the diagnosis of nAMD.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAngiographyFemaleFluoresceinHumansIndocyanine GreenMacular DegenerationMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Optical CoherenceFluoresceinIndocyanine Green

Identifiers

PMID29707575
PMCPMC5863302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.