Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707499›Full record

ReviewAnnals of cardiothoracic surgery2018

Cervical exenteration.

Uma M Sachdeva, Michael Lanuti

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of cardiothoracic surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Uma M SachdevaDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Michael LanutiDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical exenteration is a radical procedure for the treatment of locally invasive cancers of the trachea, esophagus, or thyroid, as well as recurrent tumors at the site of a tracheal stoma, and occasionally for benign disease. Exenteration involves removal of the larynx, pharynx, esophagus, and trachea, as well as associated lymphatic tissue. The tracheal stump is brought up as a cervical or mediastinal tracheostomy, depending on the length and the location of the distal resection site. The alimentary tract can be reconstructed with several types of conduits, but most commonly the stomach or left colon are used. Tension on the innominate artery must be avoided when repositioning the trachea to prevent innominate artery erosion. Tension on the artery can be addressed by either dividing the vessel or by transposing the trachea inferior and lateral to the innominate artery and vein. Overall, cervical exenteration is associated with a significant risk of morbidity, including anastomotic leak, innominate artery erosion, and tracheostomy dehiscence with subsequent mediastinitis, as well as the potential for postoperative death. Nevertheless, in highly selected patients, it can provide an unparalleled opportunity for either cure or palliation, with functional results equivalent to that of total laryngectomy.

Indexed as

aortic homograftconduitMediastinal tracheostomyreconstructionskin flap

Identifiers

PMID29707499
PMCPMC5900087
OpenAlexW4234006331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.