ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2018
The Functional Impact of Breast Reconstruction: An Overview and Update.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The usefulness of artificial intelligence in breast reconstruction: a systematic review.Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan) · 2024Pooled it
- Risk factors for long-term arm morbidities following breast cancer treatments: A systematic review.Oncotarget · 2023Pooled it
- Outcomes of ADM-Assisted Implant-based Breast Reconstructions According to Division Types of the Pectoralis Major Muscle.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Understanding the Impacts of Surgical Drains on Postoperative Pain and Quality of Life.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Innovations in Nipple-areolar Complex Reconstruction: Evaluation of a New Prosthesis.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- SLAM-based Breast Reconstruction System for Surgical Guidance Using a Low-Cost Camera.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2024Article
- Quality of life in breast reconstruction: a comparison of lightweight and conventional breast implants.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024Article
- Early Complications in Prepectoral Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction.Annals of surgical oncology · 2024Article
- Article
- Main factors determining the use of free MS-TRAM and DIEP flaps and comparing the results of breast reconstruction.Journal of medicine and life · 2023Article
- Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for the Assessment of Patient Satisfaction and Health-Related Quality of Life Following Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2022Article
- Article
- The musculoskeletal consequences of latissmus dorsi breast reconstruction in women following mastectomy for breast cancer.PloS one · 2018Article
- Current physical therapy care of patients undergoing breast reconstruction for breast cancer: a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Brazil.Brazilian journal of physical therapyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
As rates of bilateral mastectomy and immediate reconstruction rise, the aesthetic and psychosocial benefits of breast reconstruction are increasingly well understood. However, an understanding of functional outcome and its optimization is still lacking. This endpoint is critical to maximizing postoperative quality of life. All reconstructive modalities have possible functional consequences. Studies demonstrate that implant-based reconstruction impacts subjective movement, but patients' day-to-day function may not be objectively hindered despite self-reported disability. For latissimus dorsi flap reconstruction, patients also report some dysfunction at the donor site, but this does not seem to result in significant, long-lasting limitation of daily activity. Athletic and other vigorous activities are most affected. For abdominal free flaps, patient perception of postoperative disability is generally not significant, despite the varying degrees of objective disadvantage that have been identified depending on the extent of rectus muscle sacrifice. With these functional repercussions in mind, a broader perspective on the attempt to ensure minimal functional decline after breast surgery should focus not only on surgical technique but also on postoperative rehabilitation. Early directed physical therapy may be an instrumental element in facilitating return to baseline function. With the patient's optimal quality of life as an overarching objective, a multifaceted approach to functional preservation may be the answer to this continued challenge. This review will examine these issues in depth in an effort to better understand postoperative functional outcomes with a focus on the younger, active breast reconstruction patient.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.