Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707296›Full record

ArticleJournal of thoracic disease2018

Sevoflurane did not show better protective effect on endothelial glycocalyx layer compared to propofol during lung resection surgery with one lung ventilation.

Hye-Jin Kim, Eunsoo Kim, Seung-Hoon Baek, Hee Young Kim, Joo-Yun Kim, Juyeon Park, Eun-Ji Choi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of thoracic disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Cerebrovascular glycocalyx damage and microcirculation impairment in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hye-Jin KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Eunsoo KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea.
Seung-Hoon BaekDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Hee Young KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Joo-Yun KimDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Juyeon ParkDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Eun-Ji ChoiDepartment of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital · KRPusan National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe endothelial glycocalyx layer (EGL) coats the alveolar capillary endothelium and plays important roles in pulmonary vascular protection, modulation, and hemostasis. Ischemia-reperfusion, which occurs during lung resection surgery with one lung ventilation (OLV), can damage the EGL. Sevoflurane is known for its protective effect against ischemia-reperfusion injury. Therefore, we hypothesized that lung resection surgery produces EGL damage and sevoflurane protects the EGL better than the intravenous anesthetic propofol.

methodsSeventy-eight patients undergoing pulmonary resection were randomly allocated into the sevoflurane (n=38) and propofol (n=40) groups. All patients received OLV and protective ventilation under sevoflurane- or propofol-based anesthesia. The concentrations of EGL injury markers (heparan sulfate and human syndecan-1) and an inflammatory marker (vascular cell adhesion molecule-1) were measured from blood samples drawn at five time points (after induction, 60 min after OLV, 120 min after OLV, end of OLV, and end of surgery).

resultsOLV increased the concentrations of EGL injury markers; heparan sulfate concentrations increased from 120 minutes after OLV (120 minutes after OLV: sevoflurane, 13.3±6.8 ng/mL, P<0.05; propofol, 14.8±6.9 ng/mL, P<0.05). Human syndecan-1 concentrations also increased from 120 minutes after OLV (120 minutes after OLV: sevoflurane, 20.4±8.9 ng/mL, P<0.05; propofol, 20.5±11.8 ng/mL, P>0.05). However, no difference in EGL injury markers was observed between the sevoflurane and propofol groups at any time point. Vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 concentrations did not show any temporal changes in either group.

conclusionsLung resection surgery with OLV produced EGL damage without any increase in inflammation. Although shedding of heparan sulfate induced by EGL injury during lung resection surgery with OLV, was less than propofol, it was not statistically significant.

Indexed as

Glycocalyxlung resection surgeryone lung ventilation (OLV)propofolsevoflurane

Identifiers

PMID29707296
PMCPMC5906236
OpenAlexW2792638484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.