Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707258›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2017

Improving readability of informed consents for research at an academic medical institution.

Kristie B Hadden, Latrina Y Prince, Tina D Moore, Laura P James, Jennifer R Holland, Christopher R Trudeau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Assessment of Consent Comprehension Among Kenyan Adolescents, Young Adults, and Parents: Comparison of Enhanced and Standard Consenting Procedures.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kristie B HaddenCenter for Health Literacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Latrina Y PrinceCenter for Health Literacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2223-5068
Tina D MooreCenter for Health Literacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Laura P JamesCenter for Health Literacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Jennifer R HollandCenter for Health Literacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.
Christopher R TrudeauCenter for Health Literacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA.

Funding

Arkansas Center for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000039 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI BECK, CORNELIA MARIE, JAMES, LAURA P · 2012 to 2014
$10.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe final rule for the protection of human subjects requires that informed consent be "in language understandable to the subject" and mandates that "the informed consent must be organized in such a way that facilitates comprehension." This study assessed the readability of Institutional Review Board-approved informed consent forms at our institution, implemented an intervention to improve the readability of consent forms, and measured the first year impact of the intervention.

methodsReadability assessment was conducted on a sample of 217 Institutional Review Board-approved informed consents from 2013 to 2015. A plain language informed consent template was developed and implemented and readability was assessed again after 1 year.

resultsThe mean readability of the baseline sample was 10th grade. The mean readability of the post-intervention sample (n=82) was seventh grade.

conclusionsProviding investigators with a plain language informed consent template and training can promote improved readability of informed consents for research.

Indexed as

health literacyhuman subjectsInformed consentplain languagereadability

Identifiers

PMID29707258
PMCPMC5915809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.