ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2017
A content analysis of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) strategies for communicating about clinical research participation online.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing the Opioid Rapid Response System™ for Lay Citizen Response to the Opioid Overdose Crisis: a Randomized Controlled Trial.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2023Trial
- Understanding Recruitment Yield From Social Media Advertisements and Associated Costs of a Telehealth Randomized Controlled Trial: Descriptive Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Trial
- Development of Written Materials for Participants in an Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias Screening Trial.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- CTSA Search Solutions: A novel approach to searching CTSA hub website content.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2022Article
- Engaging Institutional Stakeholders to Develop and Implement Guidelines for Recruiting Participants in Research Studies Using Social Media: Mixed Methods, Multi-Phase Process.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021Article
- Perspectives of pregnant and breastfeeding women on longitudinal clinical studies that require non-invasive biospecimen collection - a qualitative study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Framing clinical and translational science: Examining the strategic social media communications of NCATS-funded CTSAs.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- A Pilot Study Determining Comprehension and the Acceptability of a Cancer Research Study Website for Cancer Patients and Caregivers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020Article
- Audience segmentation as a strategy for enhancing the use of research registries for recruiting patients into clinical trials.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2020Article
- Communication strategies for designing Facebook advertising campaigns to recruit rural participants to develop healthcare delivery interventions.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2020Article
- Recruitment in online research for COPD: leveraging social media and research registries.ERJ open research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThere is a dearth of literature providing guidance on how to effectively communicate about clinical research (CR).
methodsUsing the transactional model of communication, a content analysis of the investigator (n=62) and participant (n=18) Web sites of institutions funded through the National Institutes of Health Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) was conducted to identify their strategies (e.g., messages) for communicating about CR participation.
resultsCTSAs targeted investigators with CR participation content across the main Web sites, although most CTSAs (n=55; 88.7%) also included CR participation content for participants. In total, 18 CTSAs (29%) hosted participant Web sites. Participant sites included 13 message types about CR participation (e.g., registry enrollment) and 5 additional channels (e.g., email, phone number) to communicate about CR. However, many CTSA participant Web sites excluded information explaining the CR process and offered CR content exclusively in English.
conclusionCTSAs should identify their target audience and design strategies (e.g., messages, channels) accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.