Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29707245›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2018

Addressing the third delay: implementing a novel obstetric triage system in Ghana.

David M Goodman, Emmanuel K Srofenyoh, Rohit Ramaswamy, Fiona Bryce, Liz Floyd, Adeyemi Olufolabi, Cecilia Tetteh, Medge D Owen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Diversifying Implementation Science: A Global Perspective.Global health, science and practice · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David M GoodmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hubert-Yeargan Center for Global Health, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Emmanuel K SrofenyohDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greater Accra Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Rohit RamaswamyGillings School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Fiona BryceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, South Tees National Health Service Trust, Richmond, UK.
Liz FloydDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, South Tees National Health Service Trust, Richmond, UK.
Adeyemi OlufolabiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Cecilia TettehDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Greater Accra Regional Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Medge D OwenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Institutional delivery has been proposed as a method for reducing maternal morbidity and mortality, but little is known about how referral hospitals in low-resource settings can best manage the expected influx of patients. In this study, we assess the impact of an obstetric triage improvement programme on reducing hospital-based delay in a referral hospital in Accra, Ghana. An Active Implementation Framework is used to describe a 5-year intervention to introduce and monitor obstetric triage capabilities. Baseline data, collected from September to November 2012, revealed significant delays in patient assessment on arrival. A triage training course and monitoring of quality improvement tools occurred in 2013 and 2014. Implementation barriers led to the construction of a free-standing obstetric triage pavilion, opened January 2015, with dedicated midwives. Data were collected at three time intervals following the triage pavilion opening and compared with baseline including: referral indications, patient and labour characteristics, waiting time from arrival to assessment and the documentation of a care plan. An obstetric triage improvement programme reduced the median (IQR) patient waiting time from facility arrival to first assessment by a midwife from 40 min (15-100) to 5 min (2-6) (p<0.001) over the 5-year intervention. The triage pavilion enhanced performance resulting in the elimination of previous delays associated with the time of admission and disease acuity. Care plan documentation increased from 51% to 96%. Obstetric triage, when properly implemented, reduced delay in a busy, low-resource hospital. The implementation process was sustained under local leadership during transition to a new hospital.

Indexed as

cohort studymaternal healthobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID29707245
PMCPMC5914900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.