Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29706992›Full record

ReviewNeural plasticity2018

NMDA Receptor Subunits Change after Synaptic Plasticity Induction and Learning and Memory Acquisition.

María Verónica Baez, Magalí Cecilia Cercato, Diana Alicia Jerusalinsky

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neural plasticity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Selective Modulation of the GluN2B/C/D ContainingACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María Verónica BaezInstituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. E. De Robertis", UBA-CONICET, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 2155 Paraguay St., 1121 CABA, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-5105-2888
Magalí Cecilia CercatoInstituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. E. De Robertis", UBA-CONICET, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 2155 Paraguay St., 1121 CABA, Argentina.
Diana Alicia JerusalinskyInstituto de Biología Celular y Neurociencia "Prof. E. De Robertis", UBA-CONICET, School of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires, 2155 Paraguay St., 1121 CABA, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-0407-7518
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

NMDA ionotropic glutamate receptors (NMDARs) are crucial in activity-dependent synaptic changes and in learning and memory. NMDARs are composed of two GluN1 essential subunits and two regulatory subunits which define their pharmacological and physiological profile. In CNS structures involved in cognitive functions as the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, GluN2A and GluN2B are major regulatory subunits; their expression is dynamic and tightly regulated, but little is known about specific changes after plasticity induction or memory acquisition. Data strongly suggest that following appropriate stimulation, there is a rapid increase in surface GluN2A-NMDAR at the postsynapses, attributed to lateral receptor mobilization from adjacent locations. Whenever synaptic plasticity is induced or memory is consolidated, more GluN2A-NMDARs are assembled likely using GluN2A from a local translation and GluN1 from local ER. Later on, NMDARs are mobilized from other pools, and there are de novo syntheses at the neuron soma. Changes in GluN1 or NMDAR levels induced by synaptic plasticity and by spatial memory formation seem to occur in different waves of NMDAR transport/expression/degradation, with a net increase at the postsynaptic side and a rise in expression at both the spine and neuronal soma. This review aims to put together that information and the proposed hypotheses.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLearningLong-Term PotentiationMemoryNeuronal PlasticityProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynapsesProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID29706992
PMCPMC5863338
OpenAlexW2790752606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.